![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
My question is do all horses bruise the same. Some people bruise much easier than others, is this also true for horses?
PS I'm not sticking up for the action of the jockeys and realize that breaking the skin of horse requires a serious strike with the whip. I was just curious. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Whips are more mental than physical. Ever see jocks "showing the whip" to the horse alongside it's head so the horse merely sees it and responds? Whips cause motion inducement via touch, noise, learned response to it. Not pain. A horse can be struck with rather significant-appearing force but it shouldn't be much different than an open-handed palm slap encouragement where the sound, touch and the learned reaction on the part of the horse are the inducement forward. Not sharp pain let alone leaving bruising.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The parts of a horse where use of the bat is allowed are where there are big, heavy muscles and tougher hide that can absorb a moderate impact without becoming injured. But there are places on the flank, inside and just ahead of the hip, where the skin is more tender and easier to damage: part of the proverbially soft underbelly. One is not supposed to hit the horse there in any circumstances, but I have to wonder if this is where these guys 'marked' their mounts. When the horse is extended, this tender area is exposed more than usual and if the jock was lazy about where his hits land...,
|