Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey2315
Not really, which is why Chuck used the word "average." In order to produce more foals, stock that was once considered unworthy of being bred was introduced. Once those inferior influences made their way in, the breed as a whole was weakened.
|
This makes no sense at all to me.
Maybe I'm in way over my head with a goofy subject like this - If these inferior influences that made their way in, were truly inferior influences, their offspring would still have no lasting impact on the breed going forward. They'd die out in all lines save the tail female line.
You're more apt to get better from a pool of 50,000 than 5,000 - and the best of the best will continue being bred to each other all the time.
The size of the foal crops have been trimmed significantly since 1986 - has this resulted in a better racing product and less weakened horses?
12-06-2010, 01:36 AM
Threaded Mode