Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2006, 05:05 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Downthestretch55
Well, as far as Godolphin goes, yes...they've made some breeders very rich, and their egos take over at the sales. Just my humble opinion...but I hardly think they are enemies. For sure they'd love to have a Derby winner...that elusive goal they'd pay any price for.
And yes, racing fans aren't high on their agenda.
But think of this for a minute. They've poured many millions into the sport for whatever their reasons.
You know as well as I do that this game takes very deep pockets.
If they have them, own several farms, employ many to help them fulfill their dream...that's ok with me.
I also would love to see their best horses run longer. You might agree with me that the risk of putting one on the track for two minutes where the purse doesn't even come close to what it would bring by breeding is a business decision. I'm not making excuses for them. I'm just attempting to understand what their motivation is.

As far as the second part of your statement...I'm not commenting.
That's between you and someone besides me.
It's their money and they can do with it as they choose ( as long as it's legal ) but I don't have to like what they do. I feel like they have a sort of " obligation " to us, the people that support racing and pay the bills, i.e. bettors, to give something back to us...and they don't. The only people they reward are the breeders, and without bettors the game would simply disappear, so their dream of winning the Derby certainly couldn't be realized, because if every better stopped tomorrow the racetracks would be shut down. There is a complete lack of acknowledgement of this by many people and none more so than Godolphin and their " do as we please " style.

Yes, they could run their horses against each other in Dubai, just as rich people could back to racing against each other on there farms, but somehow I am guessing the glory would be gone with no gamblers left to support the game as the world wide prestige and attention would disappear.

Far-fetched? Of course but I'm making a point. My point is there should be a symbiotic relationship with horse owners and racing fans and there simply isn't at least when it comes to Godolphin.

As far as the game taking " deep pockets ", no doubt, but the need for even deeper pockets has been caused very much by Godolphin. And just to be fair, I am no fan of Coolmore either, in fact I have even bigger problems with them which I simply can't get into. But, suffice to say, neither of these stables have made racing better for us racing fans in the grander scheme of things.
  #2  
Old 10-12-2006, 05:09 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just imagine if George Bush spent $56 million on horses at a sale.
  #3  
Old 10-12-2006, 05:11 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Just imagine if George Bush spent $56 million on horses at a sale.

He would most certainly do at it at the annual dispersal of maiden claimers at Beulah.
  #4  
Old 10-12-2006, 05:17 PM
Downthestretch55 Downthestretch55 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stamford, NY
Posts: 4,618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
It's their money and they can do with it as they choose ( as long as it's legal ) but I don't have to like what they do. I feel like they have a sort of " obligation " to us, the people that support racing and pay the bills, i.e. bettors, to give something back to us...and they don't. The only people they reward are the breeders, and without bettors the game would simply disappear, so their dream of winning the Derby certainly couldn't be realized, because if every better stopped tomorrow the racetracks would be shut down. There is a complete lack of acknowledgement of this by many people and none more so than Godolphin and their " do as we please " style.

Yes, they could run their horses against each other in Dubai, just as rich people could back to racing against each other on there farms, but somehow I am guessing the glory would be gone with no gamblers left to support the game as the world wide prestige and attention would disappear.

Far-fetched? Of course but I'm making a point. My point is there should be a symbiotic relationship with horse owners and racing fans and there simply isn't at least when it comes to Godolphin.

As far as the game taking " deep pockets ", no doubt, but the need for even deeper pockets has been caused very much by Godolphin. And just to be fair, I am no fan of Coolmore either, in fact I have even bigger problems with them which I simply can't get into. But, suffice to say, neither of these stables have made racing better for us racing fans in the grander scheme of things.
Thanks for explaining your position.
I also agree that there needs to be a better relationship between owners and bettors. The bettors DO indeed grease the wheels of this sport. No debate there at all.
I can't wait for the day when one of my homebreds beats one of theirs by thirty lengths. Both stables you mentioned.
Sure makes it fun for me. Godolphin and Coolmore have their dreams...and so do I.
Isn't it great when the mighty are humbled?
  #5  
Old 10-12-2006, 05:22 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I actually expected them to run him next year, I really screwed up in believing that would happen.
Money shouldn't mean that much to them that he has to be rushed off to stud now. I thought a guy who loved racing as much as Sheikh Mo would want to campaign him again at 4. I'm especially shocked that he made this decision before the BC has even been run. If he loses, I'd think he would want to run him again next year to attempt to accomplish that goal.
Its sad, but I guess between retirements and the gruel of the Tri Crown, our chances of seeing a deep older horse division in my lifetime are dim.
  #6  
Old 10-12-2006, 06:53 PM
Bold Reasoning
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
I actually expected them to run him next year, I really screwed up in believing that would happen.
Money shouldn't mean that much to them that he has to be rushed off to stud now. I thought a guy who loved racing as much as Sheikh Mo would want to campaign him again at 4. I'm especially shocked that he made this decision before the BC has even been run. If he loses, I'd think he would want to run him again next year to attempt to accomplish that goal.
Its sad, but I guess between retirements and the gruel of the Tri Crown, our chances of seeing a deep older horse division in my lifetime are dim.
The rumors of his retirement are greatly exaggerated and unfounded, at this point.
  #7  
Old 10-12-2006, 07:18 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
I thought a guy who loved racing as much as Sheikh Mo would want to campaign him again at 4.
He likes winning not racing
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.