vic off his meds..

[RockHardTen1985]

[quote=Dahoss;715363]Afraid of what? Someone disagreeing with them?[/QUOTE

Afraid of the Rachel is better period argument, that then leads to insults from the same 3-5 people.

[Dahoss]

So afraid of another opinion. Maybe the pretty horsey boards would be better for those afraid.

[Rudeboyelvis]

[quote=RockHardTen1985;715364]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Afraid of what? Someone disagreeing with them?[/QUOTE

Afraid of the Rachel is better period argument, that then leads to insults from the same 3-5 people.

Joseph we need a cypher

[the_fat_man]

[quote=RockHardTen1985;715364]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Afraid of what? Someone disagreeing with them?[/QUOTE

Afraid of the Rachel is better period argument, that then leads to insults from the same 3-5 people.

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I stongly agree, others do, but are affraid to speak on it.

A, which is lesser quality than B, beats C in a race. As a result, C's connections FAIL to HONOR their COMMITMENT for the AB, which is won by B (EASILY). C is then retired later in the year, before the BC. It follows that C is MUCH BETTER than B. Hey, it's not like just any horse can lose to the great Persistently.

ha ha ha

All the MOFO's making this 'argument' seriously need to consider getting BACK on their MEDS.

[Dahoss]

[quote=the_fat_man;715370]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

A, which is lesser quality than B, beats C in a race. As a result, C's connections FAIL to HONOR their COMMITMENT for the AB. C is then retired later in the year, before the BC. It follows that C is MUCH BETTER than B.

ha ha ha

All the MOFO's making this 'argument' seriously need to consider getting BACK on their MEDS.

Get over it already man.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I stongly agree, others do, but are affraid to speak on it.

Classic. We shall overcommmmmee. Yeah, there's a real shortage of tards who scream about Zenyatta > Rachel.

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Get over it already man.

You realize who you're talking to, right?

[Smooth Operator]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

A, which is lesser quality than B, beats C in a race. As a result, C's connections FAIL to HONOR their COMMITMENT for the AB, which is won by B (EASILY). C is then retired later in the year, before the BC. It follows that C is MUCH BETTER than B. Hey, it's not like just any horse can lose to the great Persistently.

ha ha ha

All the MOFO's making this 'argument' seriously need to consider getting BACK on their MEDS.

LOL … great stuff, Fats


Unfortunately the RA fans can't handle the TRUTH…

[Clip-Clop]

[quote=the_fat_man;715370]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

A, which is lesser quality than B, beats C in a race. As a result, C's connections FAIL to HONOR their COMMITMENT for the AB, which is won by B (EASILY). C is then retired later in the year, before the BC. It follows that C is MUCH BETTER than B. Hey, it's not like just any horse can lose to the great Persistently.

ha ha ha

All the MOFO's making this 'argument' seriously need to consider getting BACK on their MEDS.

Only true if B beats A. Theory requires this to make it stand. This is the scientific method. Opinions have no place in this theory.