![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
They're not winning the Super Bowl this year with or without him. This move gives them something. A 3rd round pick for that guy is a solid deal. It would be a HORRIBLE business decision to give him a 3 year deal. He's not getting any better or younger. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yeah but you keep strokin' those cocks until Saturday. We'll see how that works out for ya.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What cocks?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() He is either referring to this......
Quote:
or Drugs.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() S. Carolina plus 7 is solid. Let Down after crushing Florida.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yeah good luck with that. Hope you crush it.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Business-wise, clearly the deal makes sense. NBA teams do this all the time- trade a final-year-of-contract player for something rather than let them walk as a FA for nothing. I thought for sure it was a bluff week 1 by Randy to get something done- I guess I was either wrong or the Pats called the bluff. But I agree with RHT that if Belichick is making this move with the premonition that they can still with the Super Bowl without him... he's being way overconfident. I still like my 10-6, 11-5 and 1st round exit from the playoffs prediction for them.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I can't stand Belichick but IMO this was a smart move. Get rid of the distraction, get a draft pick and there is enough left of the season that it won't effect them too much. Their offense is always going to score points in bunches. Not having Moss isn't going to change that. Their defense is going to be what makes or breaks them this year. |