![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The 1-to-5 chalk would have still finished ahead of the 4 despite such an infraction ... so no, there would have been no change on account of the fact that you can't DQ a horse if the one they foul finishes ahead of them.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
of course, but i think he is referring to IF the horse that won was large odds and interfered with a 1:5 shot the same way. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() If they would have DQ twirling candy and placed him last, just imagine the show payoffs with the 1-5 shot, and the second choice out of the exotics.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This is what is was implying....
|