![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Might have been posted elsewhere, but what was Uncle Mo's fig?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I couldn't find it because no other horse in the race had run yet either.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
OK, any idea what the raw number was though?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, by the Beyer chart, it was faster than all the stakes. However, 5f races can vary wildly from the standard chart at Saratoga as well as many other tracks. Do a search of "Beyer Speed Chart" and you can look them up very quickly.
I just saw it posted somewhere else as a 102. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Early fig was a 102. But Beyer is consulting with PG1985 later to make sure it's correct.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
He might want to consult with somebody on the Travers.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
What did you get for the Travers? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not sure yet, but it won't be near 105. 100 is pushing it in my opinion.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was the only route so whoever makes it, it is a guess. Looking at the pace of the race, a 105 is extremely unlikely. There are lots of ways to look at the race, and given the biased track I could see giving a 105 thinking the winner ran a new top staying on the rail.
Of course, it wouldn't be a new top if Beyer hadn't changed a 109 (something like that at least) three races back for the winner to a 101. |