|
|
 |
|
#13
10-07-2006, 08:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
[quote=Danzig188]CQ may be the best in here, but he's definitely a valid bet against today for several reasons.
one, who bets 2 to go back for 2.10? two, the surface is a huge question mark. back when turdstone ran on that sealed track, the announcers said he was so much classier, he should win regardless of the shape of the track. oops. three, we all know that two year olds can move up or down in a moments' notice. as for the 'capping angle....i don't dislike poly due to 'betability, i don't place enough bets to care about it. i'm not thrilled with thousands of horses being put on a foreign substance, completely out of their element, and now they're a bunch of guinea pigs. kickback issues? uhhhh...we'll see.. hoof problems? shoeing questions? i just wish so many tracks hadn't leaped on so quickly, before any real time has been spent studying this stuff and it's effects. hope for the horses' sake it turns out well.[/QUOTE studying this stuff and its effects? well its been used overseas for atleast a decade now zieg 
|
Threaded Mode