8/2 Play Around

jms62 · #1 08-02-2010, 12:54 PM

Sar 3

20 Win 1-Zealous Boy

20 DD 1/2

the_fat_man · #2 08-02-2010, 12:57 PM

SAR R3:

#4, Mighty Tuff, win @ >= 10:1

Dominguez either beats me or doesn't get it done for me. Let's see if this'll change here.

tiggerv · #3 08-02-2010, 01:04 PM

SAR R3

$20 Win 2

DJARUM · #4 08-02-2010, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

SAR R3:

#4, Mighty Tuff, win @ >= 10:1

Dominguez either beats me or doesn't get it done for me. Let's see if this'll change here.

7:1, hope you got em

the_fat_man · #5 08-02-2010, 01:11 PM

I did, thanks.

I even had him in the contest to break an 0 for 13 start.

tiggerv · #6 08-02-2010, 01:13 PM

Nice job Fats, glad the Pletcher rat got beat at least.

My horse must not have gotten enough Hushion juice.

the_fat_man · #7 08-02-2010, 01:14 PM

TY. Was lucky to get a perfect ride by Dominguez.

jms62 · #8 08-02-2010, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

I did, thanks.

I even had him in the contest to break an 0 for 13 start.

Nice Hit

MaTH716 · #9 08-02-2010, 01:18 PM

Nice score Fats.

RockHardTen1985 · #10 08-02-2010, 01:20 PM

Would be nice getting Todd home here at 1-5.

hockey2315 · #11 08-02-2010, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

SAR R3:

#4, Mighty Tuff, win @ >= 10:1

Dominguez either beats me or doesn't get it done for me. Let's see if this'll change here.

I don't get it. He wasn't 10-1 or higher. What's the point of an odds threshhold then?

tiggerv · #12 08-02-2010, 01:49 PM

It must be nice to have Repole money and be able to drop expensive horses into claimers to get wins.

RockHardTen1985 · #13 08-02-2010, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockey2315

I don't get it. He wasn't 10-1 or higher. What's the point of an odds threshhold then?

Do not ever call TFM out, he has his system AND IT WORKS.

MaTH716 · #14 08-02-2010, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Do not ever call TFM out, he has his system AND IT WORKS.

I don't think he was calling him out. It's a very fair question. What's the point of specifing a play based on odds then?

the_fat_man · #15 08-02-2010, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockey2315

I don't get it. He wasn't 10-1 or higher. What's the point of an odds threshhold then?

It's what I set my conditional wagering for @ 0 minutes to post time. I anticipate horses going up or down. In this case, at the time I bet, I anticipated the horse going up, as it was consistently 9:1.

When it got hit, but not hit significantly, I overrode the constraint. It's pretty much a coin toss for these cases. Sometimes I don't get my odds and they win; others they lose.

Nothing furtive about it at all. I was asked after the race if I'd bet the horse, and, in this case I had.

hockey2315 · #16 08-02-2010, 02:06 PM

Thanks for the intelligent and cordial response.