![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks for reposting that for him to see!!!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() That was the plan.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I know!
I was genuinely thanking you! Maybe I'm facetious too often around here. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
W/ me, YES. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() How does the Kelso keep it's G2 Rating when it gets switched from the turf to the dirt?
Last edited by Alan07 : 07-27-2010 at 11:41 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Don't let that keep you up tonight.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What was the reasoning behind moving the Kelso to the dirt? If there is a glaring need for a NYRA prep for the BC Dirt Mile, then the Vosburgh could have been moved back to 7 panels and serve as a prep for the Dirt Sprint and Mile. Even though the Kelso had competition from the Shadwell Mile at Keeneland, the Kelso remained an attractive stakes race.
It will be interesting to see how much competition the Kelso will get from the $300k Monmouth Cup run six days later over 9 furlongs.
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() seriously, if they can move dirt races to awt and they keep the grade, i don't see a problem here. on another note, wouldn't less stakes and more money to daily purses be better overall? |