Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-19-2010, 02:35 PM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
So where were the guys they were going to replace those players with?
Please tell me what catchers have been available that can hit like Posada still can? You seriously don't think that Mariano Rivera couldnt get 45 million on the open market 2 years ago??? Brad lidge got 37.5 for 3 years! Brad freakin Lidge! And that was a season removed from him having a 5.28 era.

Only someone who was clueless would infer that the Red Sox did the wrong thing by letting those players go. Yeah It would have been a good move to keep pedro and pay him 50 million and get a single good season out of him. And Millar really lit it up as a 37 year old in the NL. And for your info, lowell is making a lot of money to do nothing. The Red Sox didnt kick him in the hip, he got hurt. Oh poor manny, he was so mistreated in Boston. That 125 million they gave him was soooo wronggg. He pouted because they did not want to give him another long term deal for mega money when he was on the decline. They were 100% right in trading him as he dogged it and faked injuries and after one good 1/2 of a season has gone steadily down hill. Would you want to be paying him 25 million a year for the next 2 years? And yes the red sox owed a great deal of gratitude to Bronson Arroyo and that 24-19 record and 4.19 era over 2 1/2 years. Trading him to a team to the NL was a terrible thing for his career. He has only been able to bank $33 million in 5 years in Cincy as a mediocre pitcher.

And the yankees didnt re-sign Damon or matsui because they wanted them to leave. Damon was offered a substandard contract with a signifigant cut in pay which was less than mike cameron and Bobby Abreau signed for. They squeezed him out. They did the same thing to Torre.

And Boston won the championship once again 3 years later (2007) after letting all those fading pieces go which makes your statement that they havent found success since entirely wrong.
but w/o Manny they haven't won squat chuck
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-19-2010, 02:38 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678 View Post
but w/o Manny they haven't won squat chuck
They have won more titles than the yankees have this decade and the yankees never ever win without outspending everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-19-2010, 02:42 PM
gales0678 gales0678 is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 3,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
They have won more titles than the yankees have this decade and the yankees never ever win without outspending everyone.
2-2 chuck ,but , you guys ain't winning squat w/o manny , he was a man among boys
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2010, 02:53 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gales0678 View Post
2-2 chuck ,but , you guys ain't winning squat w/o manny , he was a man among boys
First of all, I am not a Red Sox fan except when they play the yankees. And that statement says all you need to know. I guess they should just cease operations up there. And 2000 was last decade.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2010, 04:41 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
They have won more titles than the yankees have this decade and the yankees never ever win without outspending everyone.
This is also wrong. You are a knowledgable guy but you keep allowing me to find inaccuracies.

In 1998, the Baltimore orioles had the highest payroll in baseball with 70 million, 8 million more than the bombers who went on that year to win the world series.

Sorry Charlie.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2010, 04:49 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
This is also wrong. You are a knowledgable guy but you keep allowing me to find inaccuracies.

In 1998, the Baltimore orioles had the highest payroll in baseball with 70 million, 8 million more than the bombers who went on that year to win the world series.

Sorry Charlie.
It was $74.1 million against $73.9 million, so yeah, technically the Yanks didn't outspend everybody, close enough though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-19-2010, 04:54 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23 View Post
It was $74.1 million against $73.9 million, so yeah, technically the Yanks didn't outspend everybody, close enough though.
hmmmm. Where did you get that info? I have a USA today chart that says 70-62 o's. Of course, they could be wrong.

Where you been Snipe? We have some gambling to do.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-19-2010, 04:58 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
hmmmm. Where did you get that info? I have a USA today chart that says 70-62 o's. Of course, they could be wrong.

Where you been Snipe? We have some gambling to do.
http://www.baseballchronology.com/Ba...98/Payroll.asp

You can view the individual salaries here too:

http://www.baseballchronology.com/Ba...8/Salaries.asp

O's wasted $5.4 million on 74 innings from Jimmy Key.


Been busy and neglecting horse racing, now that Saratoga season is starting I will be around more.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-19-2010, 05:16 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23 View Post
http://www.baseballchronology.com/Ba...98/Payroll.asp

You can view the individual salaries here too:

http://www.baseballchronology.com/Ba...8/Salaries.asp

O's wasted $5.4 million on 74 innings from Jimmy Key.


Been busy and neglecting horse racing, now that Saratoga season is starting I will be around more.
http://content.usatoday.com/sports/b...aspx?year=1998
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-19-2010, 05:01 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
This is also wrong. You are a knowledgable guy but you keep allowing me to find inaccuracies.

In 1998, the Baltimore orioles had the highest payroll in baseball with 70 million, 8 million more than the bombers who went on that year to win the world series.

Sorry Charlie.
Well my proof readers just havent been keeping up. I figure that gales is allowed literary license (or to just make things up like the great umpire conspiricy) then I can generalize. That and the "wooden leg" thread have me distracted.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-19-2010, 05:15 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Well my proof readers just havent been keeping up. I figure that gales is allowed literary license (or to just make things up like the great umpire conspiricy) then I can generalize. That and the "wooden leg" thread have me distracted.
Is that "chuckese" for "I was wrong about that. My mistake."
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-19-2010, 05:38 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani View Post
Is that "chuckese" for "I was wrong about that. My mistake."
Yes because I always expect someone to comb through salary archives trying to find a way to nitpick about a general statement that I made to another poster.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.