Saturday Beyers

[philcski]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Don't be so disingenuous. I wasn't going to bring this up, but you know (and Steve too) that you posted the OWNER of the PA board posted drunk at 3am and then deleted his threads when he sobered up. It was complete lunacy on your part, and more importantly it was unprovoked.

Since he is my friend and you post there, of course I'm going to tell him.

BULLSHIT.

The FACT is you (deliberately or not) misquoted me. I said "I like the PA board but the owner posts inflammatory comments AT 3am LIKE he is drunk." Which he does- and I brought up the links when he sent me a PM. Whether or not he was actually drunk is beside the point. He says he does not drink and it is work related that he's up at that time. Fine, whatever. If somebody said that about me I wouldn't get my goddamn panties in a bunch like you did, running to tell like a little kid.

The fact that you dislike me, because I proved you very wrong the other day, made you meld several others' comments into mine- because it was the topic of discussion in that thread.

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by philcski

BULLSHIT.

The FACT is you (deliberately or not) misquoted me. I said "I like the PA board but the owner posts inflammatory comments AT 3am LIKE he is drunk." Which he does- and I brought up the links when he sent me a PM. Whether or not he was actually drunk is beside the point. He says he does not drink and it is work related that he's up at that time. Fine, whatever. If somebody said that about me I wouldn't get my goddamn panties in a bunch like you did, running to tell like a little kid.

The fact that you dislike me, because I proved you very wrong the other day, made you meld several others' comments into mine- because it was the topic of discussion in that thread.

Wow, maybe eventually you'll get something right. I'm sure Steve can retrieve the post if he wants. I certainly didn't pretend to quote you exactly (and I wasn't the only "little kid" that let Mike know), but I am 100% certain I had the gist of it right.

I honestly have no idea where you proved me wrong. Remind me. It won't be the first or last time I was wrong. I certainly didn't take it personally since I don't even remember it. I liked talking figures with you. You seemed sincere when you thanked me for telling you about the Belmont mile Beyer adjustment and I know you are pretty knowledgeable.

You seem different lately. Things changed in your life for the worse? I don't get it.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

Wow, maybe eventually you'll get something right. I'm sure Steve can retrieve the post if he wants. I certainly didn't pretend to quote you exactly (and I wasn't the only "little kid" that let Mike know), but I am 100% certain I had the gist of it right.

I honestly have no idea where you proved me wrong. Remind me. It won't be the first or last time I was wrong. I certainly didn't take it personally since I don't even remember it. I liked talking figures with you. You seemed sincere when you thanked me for telling you about the Belmont mile Beyer adjustment and I know you are pretty knowledgeable.

You seem different lately. Things changed in your life for the worse? I don't get it.

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...7&postcount=39
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...5&postcount=63
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...1&postcount=66

Then, shortly after that, I get a snarky, and unexplained, comment:
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...53&postcount=5

Perhaps I was reading too much into it.

I like(d) you too, CJ. Always been a fan of your knowledge and approach to the game. However, I thought it was cowardly when you expressed commentary HERE elsewhere. We don't need Steve to bring up old posts because what I said was certainly not inflammatory, or at least enough to warrant this type of anger on your part and his part- and quite frankly it seems my opinion of not liking him is backed by several other people here.

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by philcski

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...7&postcount=39
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...5&postcount=63
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...1&postcount=66

Then, shortly after that, I get a snarky, and unexplained, comment:
http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...53&postcount=5

Perhaps I was reading too much into it.

I like(d) you too, CJ. Always been a fan of your knowledge and approach to the game. However, I thought it was cowardly when you expressed commentary HERE elsewhere. We don't need Steve to bring up old posts because what I said was certainly not inflammatory, or at least enough to warrant this type of anger on your part and his part.

I said I didn't have the specific numbers, but I guess technically I was wrong, I can live with that. I still know it is much easier to show a paper profit at smaller tracks with small pools than it is at larger ones. I just don't have time right now to do all the research with about 50 tracks running a week. Come winter I can revisit that.

As for the unexplained comment, I forgot about it. Drugs went fishing with another "hey, look at me thread", without mentioning specifics. He reeled you right in. He was begging to be asked why DeShawn Parker was important.

If it wasn't inflammatory, why was it deleted?

[philcski]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

If it wasn't inflammatory, why was it deleted?

Everybody's comments were deleted. There were about 10 posts removed. I don't question Steve's decisions on these things because he basically allows us to self govern this site.

Originally Posted by cmorioles

As for the unexplained comment, I forgot about it. Drugs went fishing with another hey, look at me thread, without mentioning specifics. He reeled you right in.

That is fine. Usually it's an interesting story, coming from Drugs.

Why was it deleted? Probably some PM's and/or e-mails about it.