Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Charles Hatton Reading Room
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2006, 02:58 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Heaven forbid he read a chart call but it's ok for you to speak of the fig? Unbelievable.
Is that what you are reduced to? I didn't quote the fig, I don't recall it exactly, but I recall it being slow. And I didn't have to "look it up".
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:01 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

It'd be nice if you all could BE NICE!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:03 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Is that what you are reduced to? I didn't quote the fig, I don't recall it exactly, but I recall it being slow. And I didn't have to "look it up".
So you accuse euro of not watching the race and give him crap for using a chart yet it's ok for you to recall the fig was slow? Don't you see the hypocrisy? You demand all of this evidence from everyone yet you're the naysayer and it's your duty to prove the surface is unbettable. You haven't. Get over it. You can't always be right. Don't be so condescending and elitist about the subject. You come off as a petty bastard.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:13 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
So you accuse euro of not watching the race and give him crap for using a chart yet it's ok for you to recall the fig was slow? Don't you see the hypocrisy? You demand all of this evidence from everyone yet you're the naysayer and it's your duty to prove the surface is unbettable. You haven't. Get over it. You can't always be right. Don't be so condescending and elitist about the subject. You come off as a petty bastard.
Maybe I need to repeat my post, Listerfiend. LMFAO!

BE NICE!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:16 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Maybe I need to repeat my post, Listerfiend. LMFAO!

BE NICE!
Listerfiend hasn't been doing his job. The river will run red with blood if he continues to slack on the job.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:26 PM
pba1817 pba1817 is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Default

People, I am posting this again because I posted it on the second page of this thread and it seems that everyone is missing the real point of Polytrack, at least the reasons for it in California.


http://www.chrb.ca.gov/

Read the sections, Administration Hearings and Complaints/Accusations.

IMO, this is the real reason the people in control are leaning to Polytrack, and thats to hopefully reduce/eliminate the necessity for trainers to cheat just to get their horses healthy enough to be competitive. Yes there is the fact that the people who manufacture and produce the Polytrack are going to profit as well, but I do not think the conspiracy runs that deep.

Do you all remember when Jeff Mullins said anyone who bets on horses is a moron or stupid???? Well he knows exactly what is going on out there on the backside at racetracks and he was simply trying to be honest and do people a favor... The game in its current form its not on the up and up, maybe it never has been, but right now the cheating is out of control.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:27 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pba1817
People, I am posting this again because I posted it on the second page of this thread and it seems that everyone is missing the real point of Polytrack, at least the reasons for it in California.


http://www.chrb.ca.gov/

Read the sections, Administration Hearings and Complaints/Accusations.

IMO, this is the real reason the people in control are leaning to Polytrack, and thats to hopefully reduce/eliminate the necessity for trainers to cheat just to get their horses healthy enough to be competitive. Yes there is the fact that the people who manufacture and produce the Polytrack are going to profit as well, but I do not think the conspiracy runs that deep.

Do you all remember when Jeff Mullins said anyone who bets on horses is a moron or stupid???? Well he knows exactly what is going on on the backside at racetracks and he was simply trying to be honest and do people a favor... The game in its current form its not on the up and up, maybe it never has been, but right now the cheating is out of control.
Thats nice to believe but don't you think its because of the supposed savings on track maintenance moreso than anything else?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:29 PM
pba1817 pba1817 is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Default

Oracle-

Economics are a part of it too. California racing is in poor shape.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-2006, 04:08 PM
pba1817 pba1817 is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merasmag
50bucks for alcohol on the premises-shame on them---how will polytrack stop juicing? that makes no sense at all
If that does not make any sense to you, then you do not understand whats going on in California racing...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2006, 04:27 PM
pba1817 pba1817 is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 541
Default

I do not know the reasons the Keeneland people decided to go to Poly, if it was the speed favoring track or what, but I know why they are doing out in California.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:15 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
So you accuse euro of not watching the race and give him crap for using a chart yet it's ok for you to recall the fig was slow? Don't you see the hypocrisy? You demand all of this evidence from everyone yet you're the naysayer and it's your duty to prove the surface is unbettable. You haven't. Get over it. You can't always be right. Don't be so condescending and elitist about the subject. You come off as a petty bastard.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
I said its unbettable for ME!!!! I also said that Joel's theory of taking 5-1 or better on this surface might be great idea and proposed taking 10-1.
You'll never beat me on any horse knowledge in any area, never, ever.
But you are a funny guy. Don't take it personally.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:19 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
I said its unbettable for ME!!!! I also said that Joel's theory of taking 5-1 or better on this surface might be great idea and proposed taking 10-1.
You'll never beat me on any horse knowledge in any area, never, ever.
But you are a funny guy. Don't take it personally.
With the full fields of course you should look for value. I thought that was common knowledge? I don't know what I would do without the brilliant advice you two give. It's great that we've got so many professional horsemen such as yourself to let us little people know where we stand.

And they wonder why the sport is dying.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:21 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
With the full fields of course you should look for value. I thought that was common knowledge? I don't know what I would do without the brilliant advice you two give. It's great that we've got so many professional horsemen such as yourself to let us little people know where we stand.

And they wonder why the sport is dying.
Are you really a little person like the chick Shatner's gonna bang on Boston legal? That kinda little?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:23 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
Are you really a little person like the chick Shatner's gonna bang on Boston legal? That kinda little?
Are you fat from the meds or the food? Or is that pic of you old and you've gone on the Slimfast diet?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:26 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pillow Pants
Are you fat from the meds or the food? Or is that pic of you old and you've gone on the Slimfast diet?
Your mom likes her lovers on the heavy side.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:22 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oh yeah here's some advice. Bet trainers who have experience training and running horses on polytrack.

You can thank me later for my brilliance.

Sincerely,

Captain Obvious

P.S. Bernardini is a great horse
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.