Rule of Thumb for wagering at Keeneland

Originally Posted by oracle80

I don't see how who I wagered on would change the outcome of how who ran where and what and how.
I'm tellin ya what I saw.
If you had actaully seen the race you might be able to debate it.
But alas, you didnt, so you wanna try and make witty quotes about dueling with tetris.
I thought I made a horrible bet at the time to be honest, and didn't blame anyone but me. I cursed myself out for betting Dallas Stewart who I have had VERY little luck wagering on. I sure didn't blame Polytrack. So you can strike that as a theory.

Ok I was just a little thrown off at this quote and I went with it.

Originally Posted by oracle80

You are a joke when it comes to race watching if you think that.
That day was my first and only day of betting polytrack.

It's obvious you don't blame poly.

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants

Ok I was just a little thrown off at this quote and I went with it.



It's obvious you don't blame poly.

That was based on With A City, and I notice you left that part of the quote out.
You aren't a very good sleuth, to say the very least.

Originally Posted by oracle80

That was based on With A City, and I notice you left that part of the quote out.
You aren't a very good sleuth, to say the very least.

So it's With A City's fault now?

Spin spin spin. I GOTTA BE RIGHT!

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants

So it's With A City's fault now?

Spin spin spin. I GOTTA BE RIGHT!

Again,
I don't know whats so hard to grasp about a race being so unformful as With A City's being a kinda negative experience in your first start playing Poly.
I certainly didn't think Lemons was any kind of cinch, I just though she was value, and it certainly didn't shock me that she lost.
WHen you can beat me in knoweldge of something, get back to me.

Originally Posted by oracle80

Again,
I don't know whats so hard to grasp about a race being so unformful as With A City's being a kinda negative experience in your first start playing Poly.
I certainly didn't think Lemons was any kind of cinch, I just though she was value, and it certainly didn't shock me that she lost.
WHen you can beat me in knoweldge of something, get back to me.

IQ test for 50k. Anytime. Anyplace.

Originally Posted by Pillow Pants

IQ test for 50k. Anytime. Anyplace. A$$holeface.

Seattleallstar offered me that same challenge, ask him how he made out with that one.

Originally Posted by oracle80

Seattleallstar offered me that same challenge, ask him how he made out with that one.

Yes or no. No more spin.

[SniperSB23]

What was so bad about With a City winning that race? The field was dreadful. Would it have been so much better if Hemingway's Key or Superfly won? Seaside Retreat? Malameeze? More than Regal? Pair of Kings? Sharp Attack? Tahoe Warrior? Laity? Silent Times? Starspangled Gator? In a race full of nags someone has to win.

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

What was so bad about With a City winning that race? The field was dreadful. Would it have been so much better if Hemingway's Key or Superfly won? Seaside Retreat? Malameeze? More than Regal? Pair of Kings? Sharp Attack? Tahoe Warrior? Laity? Silent Times? Starspangled Gator? In a race full of nags someone has to win.

And it has to be Oracle's horse. Don't you see?

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

What was so bad about With a City winning that race? The field was dreadful. Would it have been so much better if Hemingway's Key or Superfly won? Seaside Retreat? Malameeze? More than Regal? Pair of Kings? Sharp Attack? Tahoe Warrior? Laity? Silent Times? Starspangled Gator? In a race full of nags someone has to win.

With A City's form on dirt was absolutely dreadful, and I mean woeful. It wasn't like he had ever been even remotely competitive in anything. He failed in claimers.
Seaside Retreat was just about as bad. When they ran 1-2 I said ok, thats it.
You devils advocate guys are piss poor. You can make that argument in hindsight with any horse.
So how much did you guys have on him? You musta made one hell of a killing because if you can justify him winning that race(of course now its in hindsight, as usual) then you should have had a bundle on him at those odds.
WHo exactly is bull****ting who here?
You guys wanna get on me because I think an impossible horse won and admit it. Then you guys wanna tell me how he figured. Gee, how much did you guys have on him then? If you didn't bet him then its pretty obvious who the bull****ters are.