Monmouth handle & attendance

[philcski]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Those posts about my penis have long since been deleated.

Let's get back to how you're tearing it up and setting the world on fire at MTH.

What's been your big edge?

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...5&postcount=28

[the_fat_man]

Originally Posted by philcski

http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/sho...5&postcount=28

It's ironic that I'm kicking ass at a track that I didn't plan on playing because I'm just against speed biased surfaces. While the main track hasn't been as consistently biased as past years, there are still days where the speed just hasn't come back. It is what it is.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

The only thing cooler than reading Light from Pace Advantage with BTW's login is reading TFM's take on how biased tracks are a good thing for bettors to avoid.

The Internet will never not be cool.

[the_fat_man]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

The only thing cooler than reading Light from Pace Advantage with BTW's login is reading TFM's take on how biased tracks are a good thing for bettors to avoid.

The Internet will never not be cool.

If you look around this board, or PA or Paceandcap, you'll find a whole bunch of evidence that my opinion is about as strong as anyone's. YET, it's like you're in the know and you compare me to an idiot I could out-handicap in my dreams. Which pretty much captures the ethos of what happens here (and elsewhere).

The problem with betting biased tracks as opposed to fair tracks is you need to do extra work to identify the bias. Sometimes this involves nothing more than looking at the day's charts. Others, it takes quite a bit of work. The point, however, is that someone who, basically, takes 5 minutes, if that much, to handicap a race really doesn't have the time to be investigating biases. Thus, I prefer fair tracks. I'm crushing MTH and I'm dong very well at DEL. So I can play biases with the best of them. It's just that I'd prefer not to. The reason I include these tracks is because they're really the only alternatives and I need about 10 tracks to play over the course of a given week.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

If you look around this board, or PA or Paceandcap, you'll find a whole bunch of evidence that my opinion is about as strong as anyone's.

Hey Chubby,

You do realize that BindTortureWound posts here right?


To make a statement even suggesting that he isn't by far the greatest to ever live at every single facet of the game ever known - it is a brazen display of disrespect.


You gloated at the very start of this thread....

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

This just in:

For the present MTH meet:

29 plays, 41% win %, +137% ROI. (more than DOUBLE my money).

Everyone knows that if BindTortureWound was seriously handicapping Monmouth his win perentage would be 82% and ROI would be +272%. (more than QUADRUPLE his money)


Know your roll chubby ... and just like with everyone else, your roll is to bask in the glory of the presence of the greatest.

Mods at boards all over (except the lady at DMTC I suppose) bow down to his every last request ... and so should you if you know what's good for you.

[the_fat_man]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Know your roll chubby ... and just like with everyone else, your roll is to bask in the glory of the presence of the greatest.

"roll"? Doubtful this is meant as a pun on your part. Just another example or your illiteracy. Remember a couple of years ago when you had that site with SAR picks and I sent you an email with a few 'spelling' corrections? Now, that was/would've been embarrassing huh? (Well, not exactly as embarrassing as going 0 for the first couple of weeks, with very limited plays, which you actually did. )

I realize that if you had to admit that I'm your equal as a handicapper, you'd probably never make it out of the house -- this, even, after your ass kissers worked on you for a month.

Which means that you probably haven't had the nerve to look at my two $41 dollar bombs last week and my $66 dollar bomb late May.

Right about now I figure you're dialing for some fast food as you reach for your meds.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

"roll"? Doubtful this is meant as a pun on your part. Just another example or your illiteracy. Remember a couple of years ago when you had that site with SAR picks and I sent you an email with a few 'spelling' corrections? Now, that was/would've been embarrassing huh? (Well, not exactly as embarrassing as going 0 for the first couple of weeks, with very limited plays, which you actually did. )

I realize that if you had to admit that I'm your equal as a handicapper, you'd probably never make it out of the house -- this, even, after your ass kissers worked on you for a month.

Which means that you probably haven't had the nerve to look at my two $41 dollar bombs last week and my $66 dollar bomb late May.

Right about now I figure you're dialing for some fast food as you reach for your meds.

Deluded post of the year.

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

YET, it's like you're in the know and you compare me to an idiot I could out-handicap in my dreams. Which pretty much captures the ethos of what happens here (and elsewhere).

Isn't that where you do your best cappin?

Oh, that's right, damnit, you don't read my posts

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by HomerS

Not for nothing but isnt point of playing to make money? Ill take biases all day long, even if it means doing extra work. Especially if it involves extra work since clearly others wont do the same. If you have spotted a bias and others havent that gives you a tremendous edge and well worth time uncovering.

One of the textbook days was June 17th.

On the 8 race card, 6 horses breaking from post position #1 won - and in the 2 races where post #1 didn't win, it was a wire-to-wire winner in each. Post 1 completed the exacta in one instance, and post 2 completed the exacta in the other instance.

The 6 winners breaking from post #1 paid: $22.40, $19.20, $10.00, $7.20, $7.80 and $6.00

The first two that paid the big prices both won wire-to-wire starting from post 1.

Any bettor who argues biases are a bad thing ... they're crazy as far as I'm concerned.