![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
1969-2010 never happened and it's all about him being a democrat. you got me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() first thing i'm reminded of when people say a democrat can change.......remember david duke? that guy ran as a conservative for governor of la. when his kkk and racist past was brought up, he said he'd changed. no one believed that either-so it goes across party lines.
as for nothing past 1969....as i said earlier, byrd voted against both thurgood marshall and clarence thomas for the supreme court. i'm pretty sure thomas was after 1969. this was too: "There are white niggers. I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time, if you want to use that word. We just need to work together to make our country a better country, and I'd just as soon quit talking about it so much." Byrd's use of the term "white nigger" created immediate controversy. When asked about it, Byrd responded, “ I apologize for the characterization I used on this program ... The phrase dates back to my boyhood and has no place in today's society ... In my attempt to articulate strongly held feelings, I may have(he may have??) offended people." that was in 2001... and then this, which i found just awful: Byrd also said that his views changed dramatically after his teenage grandson was killed in a 1982 traffic accident, which put him in a deep emotional valley. "The death of my grandson caused me to stop and think," said Byrd, adding he came to realize that black people love their children as much as he does his. he had to come to that realization? what, did he think people that differed in color couldn't love? that's outrageous.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Most of his life he was a racist. Yeah I got you defending a complete d.ickhead. But just keep going because you're never wrong.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() danny: unless it occurred in the last year, david duke has never publicly changed his views. he changed party affiliation and that's it.
coach: well done. you again deflected the argument. it's now about defending byrd and not responding to the ridiculous assertion that byrd got away with his pre-1967 views only because he's a democrat. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() last word
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
point is, no one believed he changed-and i don't believe byrd changed either-except publically. it's kind of like when mel gibson got pulled over that night when he was drunk, and started on his anti-semitic rant. he's always felt that way, but alcohol loosened his tongue. it's not as tho he changed his feelings just cause he had a few. it was politically expedient for byrd to 'change'...now, i didn't know the man personally, but i know how resistant humans are to change. i also know that the private persona can be far different from the public one. he's a politician, and was a good one, which is why he stayed so long. but his actions, and his words, showed that maybe he wasn't as changed as he portrayed himself.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |