![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It was a very fast race.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I need to really learn this game then, I saw 2 horses plodding home who wanted no part of really going long, the 1 had really no excuse at all.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Honestly, this is a given.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know the race went 6 seconds faster then the one before, but that race before is like bottom level junk, no?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
" Bottom level junk " run speed figures as well. 38 lengths at 1 1/16 equals around 65 Beyer points. Everything is relative. The third finisher in the 9th lost by 16 3/4 lengths. That's around 28 Beyer points. Did you look at his pps? This stuff isn't rocket science.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I guess this is why the game is not as simple as beyers... This race will come back large, and I want no part of either of these horses next out, especially if its in races like the Jim Dandy or Haskell. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
And therein lies part of the problem. You insist on making kneejerk reactions to performances and forming opinions both seconds after races are run and subsequently weeks before others are even drawn, much less run. What exactly is the upside in this? So you can make internet declarations? How much money does that translate to at the windows?
Some of us have to offer opinions a day or two before races are run. For no reason whatsoever you insist on doing it weeks in advance. Preconceived notions will get you nowhere.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
So if you were Nick, would you be disappointed? It looks like he set fast fractions and had every right to get tired. He may not want to run long as he appears to be something of a speed demon. I haven't seen the race, just read the recap in the Form.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm going to go on a limb here as well and state that I don't want either of these plugs back in a major race, on a NON SPEED FAVORING SURFACE, either.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Im not sure how much of a limb that is? Andy is right about me making a quick snap opinions, but I also trust my opinion. Would I give either of these 2 a shot against the likes of Trappe Shot, Lookin at Lucky, or even Afleet Express, NO WAY.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm actually sweating it. You know how much FAST horses influence my handicapping.
ha ha ha |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
He's good but to mention him as a top 3YO before we've even seen him go two turns is premature. NT |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What was so questionable about the allowance field he beat? As far as allowance fields go these days ... I thought that was an extremely tough entry level alw race. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it was more of a shot at me... This is from a guy who has talked Trappe Shot up to me for months now as one to watch, potential top 3 yr old... Now all the sudden A Little Warm is better?
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I also never said A Little Warm was better than Trappe Shot. I made a comment about him being considered an elite 3YO. Call me old fashioned, but I'd like to see a 3YO go two turns before I consider him a Travers horse. NT |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I take all Delaware races with a grain of salt, and I don't think anyone here is declaring the first two world beaters, despite how high the number will come back, but in this 3YO crop they aren't bad.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
The early number is 106 for the winner.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |