Ahhhhh she did it!!!!

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by CSC

I haven't seen any such comparison this year for Princess Rachel, and that was the point. I thought you would get it, maybe I was wrong.

Um, you may wanna rethink this one.

Cheering loudly that only those like you are ridiculous and out of touch enough with reality to even make a claim like that doesn't actually prove any point about how good Zenyatta may or may not be -- just how absolutely insane you guys have become.

The fact that those who still think Rachel is an excellent horse aren't stupid enough to pretend she could beat Secretariat says everything about the fact that they're able to speak about a horse without horsesh*t hyperbole, something you turned off months ago. You don't get a point for saying "well nobody is saying Rachel could beat Secretariat," because that just shows that we're not idiots, nothing more, nothing less.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

Um, you may wanna rethink this one.

Cheering loudly that only those like you are ridiculous and out of touch enough with reality to even make a claim like that doesn't actually prove any point about how good Zenyatta may or may not be -- just how absolutely insane you guys have become.

The fact that those who still think Rachel is an excellent horse aren't stupid enough to pretend she could beat Secretariat says everything about the fact that they're able to speak about a horse without horsesh*t hyperbole, something you turned off months ago. You don't get a point for saying "well nobody is saying Rachel could beat Secretariat," because that just shows that we're not idiots, nothing more, nothing less.

I'll keep this short, so you guys cannot try take a statement and run with it in an effort to try to obfuscate it's meaning. To make this as idiot proof as possible, there have been much more writers apt to include Zenyatta among the greats of racing than Rachel Alexandra, in that group among greats is Secretariat. I think anyone here will concede he is a horse without equals. That was it.

Originally Posted by CSC

I'll keep this short, so you guys cannot try take a statement and run with it in an effort to try to obfuscate it's meaning. To make this as idiot proof as possible, there have been much more writers apt to include Zenyatta among the greats of racing than Rachel Alexandra, in that group among greats is Secretariat. I think anyone here will concede he is a horse without equals. That's was it.

To make it idiot proof you would have to refrain from posting.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

To make it idiot proof you would have to refrain from posting.

How about those Lakers?
Its over man....Its over man

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

How about those Lakers?
Its over man....Its over man

It's never over.

Off-off topic: Did any of your grammar teachers back in the day commit suicide?

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

To make it idiot proof you would have to refrain from posting.

Why because you were so wrong about Rachel Alexandra, look in the mirror el stupido. BTW Keep celebrating that gr.2 win Saturday. Nice to know she can still win a race. 1/3 not bad 33% in 2010 Zenyatta 17/17 100%

Originally Posted by CSC

Why because you were so wrong about Rachel Alexandra, look in the mirror el stupido. BTW Keep celebrating that gr.2 win Saturday. Nice to know she can still win a race. 1/3 not bad 33% Zenyatta 17/17 100%

Go get f.ucked in the ass by Summer Bird, poof.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by CSC

I'll keep this short, so you guys cannot try take a statement and run with it in an effort to try to obfuscate it's meaning. To make this as idiot proof as possible, there have been much more writers apt to include Zenyatta among the greats of racing than Rachel Alexandra, in that group among greats is Secretariat. I think anyone here will concede he is a horse without equals. That's was it.

I appreciate what your doing.. Your taking a lot of the heat off of me, I think your on your way, if not already there as this websites biggest **** FACE.
I mean I love Z, and I think shes better then Rachel, BUT that does not mean Rachel is not really good/great. You take this **** to totally new levels.

[brianwspencer]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I appreciate what your doing.. Your taking a lot of the heat off of me, I think your on your way, if not already there as this websites biggest **** FACE.
I mean I love Z, and I think shes better then Rachel, BUT that does not mean Rachel is not really good/great. You take this **** to totally new levels.

When you've got my buddy RHT publicly thanking you for making him look brilliant, it's pretty clear that it's just gone too far.

I love this post.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by brianwspencer

When you've got my buddy RHT publicly thanking you for making him look brilliant, it's pretty clear that it's just gone too far.

I love this post.

Im glad to here we are pals.... Back in the day, I thought you hated me.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I appreciate what your doing.. Your taking a lot of the heat off of me, I think your on your way, if not already there as this websites biggest **** FACE.
I mean I love Z, and I think shes better then Rachel, BUT that does not mean Rachel is not really good/great. You take this **** to totally new levels.

Rachel was a very good horse in 09, just how good I don't know. For some they needed her to face better competition post Woodward to define her legacy just as some need Zenyatta to beat males on dirt. Each horseplayer has the right to use their own guidelines to determine a horse's greatness. Do I think Rachel is a talented horse, obcourse I do, I also believe she is overrated, and we will see if she can match her Woodward win of last year. Hopefully the field this year will consist of something better than the usual suspects of last year. But nope, I don't think she is awful by any means. Infact I have no problem still saying she is a very good horse, but she is certainly not as good as Zenyatta in my opinion.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I appreciate what your doing.. Your taking a lot of the heat off of me, I think your on your way, if not already there as this websites biggest **** FACE.
I mean I love Z, and I think shes better then Rachel, BUT that does not mean Rachel is not really good/great. You take this **** to totally new levels.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I forgot Ghostzapper, the Beyer's pick so obcourse it can't be wrong. Too bad DrugS and The Fatman are no longer here to debate this one.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I appreciate what your doing.. Your taking a lot of the heat off of me, I think your on your way, if not already there as this websites biggest **** FACE.
I mean I love Z, and I think shes better then Rachel, BUT that does not mean Rachel is not really good/great. You take this **** to totally new levels.

Don't take this the wrong way, but I may have to pay more attention to you. I never knew you were the...atleast you made a new internet pal in Brian S. That's what I do bring people together.