![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Happy Days are Here Again! The Sky is Blue... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
According to DRF, it looks like the Fleur De Lis for Rachel. Certainly makes the most sense, no surprise.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like her chances.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Zenyatta.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm waiting for the official Jess Jackson press release...I hope he lets everyone know how fit she is for this race. I believe she was about 95.873% fit for her last so she should be getting there now. I think Rachel is great!
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
hes moving it up to 96.78%.......can't go to 98 or 99% just in case(she loses).....face it if she can't win this week theres big problems.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
NTRA thinks so too. Thing is, now they're saying only Distinctive Dixie's a probable besides Rachel. She finished 6th behind Unrivaled Belle, RA, and a 5th place Zardana in the La Troienne. Hmm. I imagine them going through the barns calling 'anybody want a G2 placing for their mare? Step right up, a guaranteed 3rd or better in a G2....' |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
By e-mail through his public-relations representative, Caroline Shaw, Jackson reiterated that "as long as she continues to progress, we intend to race her with the expectation that she will obtain her fitness level of last year."
Looks like she still won't be 100% fit for the Fleur de Lis...guess we'll have to wait for the next race and next press release from Jackson. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
The comment "fitness level" is funny.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Shouldn't you be stalking some other posters on the board...you freaking weirdo.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dude, I don't care. I didn't read the DRF article, and NTRA's running of the article themselves might as well be "We concur." A little tightly wound today, are we? Geez. I got it on NTRA's website, so excuuuse me..
![]() |