![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
But what was Belmont's ontrack handle?
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why do we always have to compare it to Belmont's handle, the fact is whatever Monmouth is doing is working. If both are healthy who cares which handle is higher.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
My feelings exactly.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is an overall industry health issue. This has little to do with NY or NJ or anyplace else...Just to be clear.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Do you really think thats true? I remember monmouth being over an hour away from new york city but i could be wrong. That being the case, wouldnt that change things a little? Also, in terms of "sustainable business models" as you put it, which track/circuits work beside the ones that are supplemented by slots? I think what Monmouth is doing is part of the future of the sport. The bigger, deeper fields with higher purses makes a lot more sense on many levels than the way Belmont or Hollywood park does it. The traditional model for horse racing as a self sustaining business is broken. The world has changed. Entertainment options both sporting or otherwise have grown exponentially since the heyday of the game. Randall hit it right on the head. These problems that you are speaking of are industry issues. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Monmouth is in New Jersey. Now, do you really want to go into the differences? In terms of accessiblity alone, we are talking about different planets. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is worthless on several levels.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let the good times roll.
Monmouth Park | Posted 6/1/2010, 5:13 pm Monmouth business booming By Matt Hegarty Betting and attendance figures for the first five days of the Monmouth Park meet have far exceeded the expectations of the track's operator and the racing officials who supported the adoption of an experimental 50-day meet guaranteeing $1 million in average purse distribution per day, the racing officials said. Over the first five days, average handle has been $8,263,283 per card, up 162 percent compared to the total average for a 93-day meet last year and up 122 percent compared to the handle on corresponding dates last year, according to figures supplied by Monmouth and on race charts. Average attendance is up 86 percent, while field size has increased by nearly two horses per race, from 7.5 last year to 9.4 this year. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes... reading his posts, sometimes I forget punctuation exists in the English language.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Revidere |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Crist goes to great efforts to compare Monmouth to Belmont again in his blog, in a negative light IMO, it escapes me why he chooses to do so other than personal bias. There is no logical comparison or reason to make such. The article is clearly to show how superior a choice Belmont is despite Monmouths best effort, which is irrelevant to anything as a horse player. The only comparison should be previous Monmouth meets. The new product that New Jersey has provided the better has led them to wager more money into the pools.
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
considering source |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Excellent consideration since I live in Monmouth County and was at Belmont yesterday !!
I am neither rich, nor powerful. Might have been a little richer if they took Maylan down yesterday in the 6th.
__________________
Revidere |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks like handle will be up more than 30%.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nope. Can't happen. 15% would be nearly unattainable.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |