5/31: Belmont (1-11); Monmouth (6-10); Hollywood (3, 7-10), Churchill (10th)

[Sethcarter]

In this case, there probably isnt any reason to consider the stat given the trainer and horse.. I'm not sure why this stat stuck out at me. I guess I was looking for a reason to bet against. At this point, I cant think of any...

[Sethcarter]

To be honest, I only started playing the horse a couple of years ago. And I am not good at it. I started playing the horses out thanks to some friends who had tickets to the preakness. And since I coach at a college and due to NCAA regs. this is the only type of gambling that is allowed... I wouldnt rely on anything I say...

And honestly this is the hardest game in the world...

[Port Conway Lane]

Originally Posted by Sethcarter

To be honest, I only started playing the horse a couple of years ago. And I am not good at it. I started playing the horses out thanks to some friends who had tickets to the preakness. And since I coach at a college and due to NCAA regs. this is the only type of gambling that is allowed... I wouldnt rely on anything I say...

And honestly this is the hardest game in the world...

Do you mean only type of sports betting ? I can't believe you aren't allowed to sit down at a card table in vegas or put a quarter in a slot machine.

BTW, QR has beaten every horse in the field except the 1 and 3 and only three horses have ever finished in front of him. As far as the p4 being worth the money if you like the other legs single him. Then I would back up your investment using Musket Man in the daily doubles.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Sethcarter

In this case, there probably isnt any reason to consider the stat given the trainer and horse.. I'm not sure why this stat stuck out at me. I guess I was looking for a reason to bet against. At this point, I cant think of any...

It's a strong field. Obviously, if Quality Road brings his 'A' game, they're running for second. I'm not saying that your approach is wrong, just that I wouldn't use Pletcher being 0-for-7 in the Met Mile as a reason to bet against QR.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Anyone looking at the .50 P5 at MTH? Looks interesting, but I'll will need to find a single as with the scratches in the last leg looks like a ALL play... I guess Ever a Friend will fall way below the 5-2 m/l in the wagering, and is close to a single as you'll find, a cut above the rest here.

[3kings]

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis

Anyone looking at the .50 P5 at MTH? Looks interesting, but I'll will need to find a single as with the scratches in the last leg looks like a ALL play... I guess Ever a Friend will fall way below the 5-2 m/l in the wagering, and is close to a single as you'll find, a cut above the rest here.

dan,
That's a tough single. The six if he fires off the layoff is 6 of 8 at Monmouth, and the 2 looks usable to me.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by 3kings

dan,
That's a tough single. The six if he fires off the layoff is 6 of 8 at Monmouth, and the 2 looks usable to me.

I agree Tom, actually had him as an A as well, and really not comfortable leaving the 5 or the 9 off somehow... but have to cut somewhere, trying to kee the ticket under 100 beans... I may look to trim in the first leg (going 4 deep there), but I've got to use 3 in the 2nd leg.... Another possible single could be the 5 in the 4th leg coming off the BC try, may need one but on class alone should have the front end all to himself

[Kasept]

BEL SCR/CHG'S


MTH SCR/CHG'S

[pointman]

Nice start getting that 3 in the tri in the 1st at Belmont, Steve! I didn't use personally, but almost got that 6.