|
|
 |
|
|
|
#2
10-02-2006, 06:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!" 
|
|
#3
10-02-2006, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Agreed Somer. Curt would have us think that one race decides a year. It doesn't.
|
|
#4
10-02-2006, 07:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Mike I am totally talking opposite of what you are thinking I am talking. No way one race defines the champion, no way. A string of races rather defines a champion, not one race. I can see what you might be thinking, a playoff like I alluded too but to me all this talk is jibber jabash. With that said and please excuse my use of the english language as I am tired and spent from a 14 hour day. Lets assume this scenario - Horse a, b and c get fairly equal press leading up to the Breeder's Cup. Support is equal at this point for these 3 to be Horse Of The Year. The race comes and is won by none of the aforementioned 3, or is won by one of the 3and it was a "suspect" race meaning trouble trip etc etc.. My point, if I have any  , is that I don't buy into this Horse Of The Year stuff. Eliminate it. Let their numbers speak for themself on the track. It really is just a collection of peoples opinions, and everyone knows that opinions are like........
|
|
#5
10-02-2006, 07:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Again, I mean no harm with this. It is just my opinion is all.
|
|
#7
10-02-2006, 08:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Suppose the 3 finalists for HOY are a Sprinter; a Turf specialist; and a dirt track dynamo. How could you run some kind of match-race that would be fair to all 3.
__________________
A pet ? It's a wild invalid.
|
|
#8
10-02-2006, 09:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
Hybrid Mode
