![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
She is very facile on dirt. Rachel proved something LAST year so it may be meaningless to imply that she continues to be less than perfect on her preferred surface . You are speculating ansd so am I--the difference is that until it is done, neither knows, but one record is flawless on both surfaces . She can and will beat males on dirt, just as she beat them on synthetic . My opinion, specualtion etc . There is however more evidence that she will than she will not . |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
95 Beyer.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmmmmmmmm.... There was a quote I remembered reading on the Eskendereya thread. It went something like: "beyers are for clowns. 88" Who said that? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"You would have to reach in time and quality to find a FEW that I would question that she could beat . . ."
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there! |