WOW

[the_fat_man]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

What was I even wrong about?

I started a freaking thread saying Zardana might be real competiton to RA. Something that 99% of people would laugh at if I didn't showcase such a good argument in the post.

I dug up trainer stats which clearly said Asmussen is a terrible layoff trainer.

I'm a classic guy who should be doing better things with his time than wasting it with you.

I'm the classic guy who can walk to the bank and withdrawl over a hundred thousand dollars in cash anytime said bank is open. And why? Because of some nice steady high paying job I've had? ... No, I've never had a "job" for more than 4 months in my life. I've never had anything even close to a "real job" ever...and you can be sure I never will.

Did I inherit something good? Nope. Trust Fund? Nope. TFM, if this is all somehow your way of pretending that your analytically superior to me .. it's a weak attempt. A 1/9 shot I wouldn't touch with fake money at those odds lost and it's like some kind of glory day for you somehow.

Why is it that a guy with your ability gets so easily worked up by my comments? Isn't the game hard enough for you? Do you really need my support? Does my opinion matter that much? Just concede that when it comes to Z and RA, you're on the wrong team. It's the numbers: they cloud your judgment. You're doing fine otherwise. Really.

All these other points you bring up merely obfuscate the issues. Don't feel bad: BTW, Beyer, CJ, DaHoss, Mike the EUNUCH, PhilSICK, they're all with you.

Thanks for the laughs

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

Why is it that a guy with your ability gets so easily worked up by my comments? Isn't the game hard enough for you? Do you really need my support? Does my opinion matter that much? Just concede that when it comes to Z and RA, you're on the wrong team. It's the numbers: they cloud your judgment. You're doing fine otherwise. Really.

All these other points you bring up merely obfuscate the issues. Don't feel bad: BTW, Beyer, CJ, DaHoss, Mike the EUNUCH, PhilSICK, they're all with you.

Thanks for the laughs

I didn't see anything today to sway me from my opinion that Rachel is better. Even on an off day she ran a better race. But, I am willing to concede that Zenyatta probably had an off day as well.

You know trips...and you know that I know ( this is like a Honeymooners routine ) that you know them.....so please don't pretend that Zenyatta didn't have a great one ( for synth ) today.

My favorite moment was when Trevor said she was eight lengths back....when she was really about four lengths behind.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

Why is it that a guy with your ability gets so easily worked up by my comments? Isn't the game hard enough for you? Do you really need my support? Does my opinion matter that much? Just concede that when it comes to Z and RA, you're on the wrong team. It's the numbers: they cloud your judgment. You're doing fine otherwise. Really.

All these other points you bring up merely obfuscate the issues. Don't feel bad: BTW, Beyer, CJ, DaHoss, Mike the EUNUCH, PhilSICK, they're all with you.

Thanks for the laughs

Where and when did YOU decide what team I'M "on"? To me, one is not better than the other until they settle it on the track. I was in the RA camp for HOTY, because she did more over the course of last year than Zenyatta did. But I was on track for both of their best races- and trying to decide between the two without them facing off is impossible.

I called you out for coming on here AFTER THE RACE to talk ****, if you had a bold opinion, you should have shared it prior to the race. The only person I saw selecting a horse other than Rachel in the race was Pacheco and she gave a reason why (even if she ended up on the wrong one her reasoning was good why Rachel could lose.) You said nothing.