![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I was very happy with my three starters/results today (3rd with Blind Luck, 3rd with Battle of Hastings, and 1st with Misremembered, so in essence 3 of the top 4 possible point earners) but when I saw the leaderboard I was somewhat dismayed. I understand working out the bugs- but this seems really fishy. How did you do?
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
She's hopeless. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
This was going into the gate: ![]() This was after the race was offical: ![]() Blind Luck stayed at 680 after the race ... and to the best of my memory no other horse on the entire page one got bumped up +1. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The thing is, even if Phil and Drugs is right, which I'm not disputing, it would seem pretty stupid to create an entry like this via cheating, especially as there are still races left to be run.
They simply have to make stables public once the month starts. |