![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tony Black is probably thinking that the same "due process" that applied to the jockeys that were ruled off for alleged race fixing a few years ago should apply to Gill.
__________________
The man who complains about the way the ball bounces is likely the one who dropped it - Lou Holtz |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Black always has Blinkers on when it comes to discussions involving Jocks. His conversations with Steve about Jocks being employees rather than independent contractors awhile back comes to mind.
__________________
GOP- Protecting Pedophiles since 2025 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You pretty much sign your rights away when you sign your stall application. Trainers know that and owners should as well. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's a disgrace that MD gave Ziadie stalls. Even more of a disgrace is that Racing Sec Hale and Chief Investigator Pogue admit to not having done their jobs prior to granting him stalls.
I've dealt with Pogue before when his main concern was that I made a license clerk at Colonial cry because she wasn't capable of doing her job as a temp hire. Just two more people that MD employs that aren't worth their weight in salt... |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
You know,bringing up the Andy Beyer article in the form today,I recall he was crowing about a trainer last year,at the same time of year,who magically improved a horse to a 115 beyer.And it was the same horse who won yesterday.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
We're a nation of bullies so of course this is entertaining.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
According to bloodhorse.com Michael Gill has been ejected from Penn National.
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...ng-starved-out |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
They use the track to make a living, and have no direct responsibility for their actions with regard to the liability they cause the track owners due to their irresponsible actions. Penn Nat or any other track for that matter can remove anyone they want for any reason they want when they feel that said person represents a threat to the track or it's business. Period. It isn't really a discussion. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's what I was wondering about. Couldn't Penn National itself just do what both Calder and Tampa did in the above examples? Just claim it as a management or business decision. No explanation...you have 72 hours to be off the grounds.
Last edited by Duvalier : 01-31-2010 at 11:06 AM. |