![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
He's definetely not a better horse, he only won by a little less than a length, not exactly a pounding, LR took the worst of it, but that's on him, it wasn't SC's fault that he won, they're both about the same talent level, not much seperates them... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I will mention one thing that seperates them, it is that some people refuse to acknowledge no matter how many times he proves it, that LR is a very good and possibly G1 type horse...If you are a LR fan, yesterday was nothing but a confirmation that he's a very good horse, that needs to learn to rate... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
No clue what Beyer did with the figure but the equibase number was a 109 for Strong Contender which translates to about a 95-99 Beyer.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
no way...it's the fastest super derby at that distance, and a few ticks off the track record. beyer is going to be in the hundreds.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Strange that they seem to have been able to rate him in some races usually against lesser competition, but not others. Why is that? In the Saint Louis race maybe it was just rust being his first off layoff, but he was also rateable
in the Southwest. Anybody know what his beyer was? I think he had to run a bigger one that the Arkansas Derby. Yesterday's race was about 3 seconds faster, I think. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
this horse is 6-8 lenghts faster if they could get a jock to do some work with him in the mornings and get him to relax.
|