What?????

[31lengths]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

You wouldn't trade a slightly diminished regular season for a badass and finally meaningful postseason? I'm pretty sure the ratings lost in the regular season would be more than made up for in the month of postseason games. That guy's arguments are ridiculous.

Good points by both. I would trade. But I also think that the "post season" should consist of a 6 team only play off system. It's rare that someone ranked 7th or more can boast a record to play for a National title. So with an only 6 team play off system, it would almost insure that the regular season would NOT be diminished. I agree that most of that article was nonsense. I'd like to see something to the effect of -

On a rotating schedule.
Dec 24 Cotton #6 v #3
Dec 24 Orange #5 v #4
Dec 31 Fiesta #1 v Worst winner from the Coton/Orange
Dec 31 Rose #2 v Best winner from the Coton/Orange
Jan 7 Sugar Championship Game

While there would not be extra games (revenue), this system was meant more to determine WHO should actually play for the title. Which is what I think most fans would like.