Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2006, 11:38 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Round Pen
Man I know some of the other races were not quite as fast last night at Woodbine, but WOW 120.2 for 7/8 is race horse time anywhere. Could it be the more they run on the new surface the faster it may be???







7 Furlongs. 3 Year Olds And Up Stakes Purse: $126,600
# Horse Jockey Weight Win Place Show
3 Verne's Baby Ramsammy E 116 17.90 6.80 5.70
8 Dave the Knave Clark D 122 3.60 3.00
7 Main Executive Dos Ramos R A 122 5.30
Times in 5ths: :223 :442 1:081 1:202
Times in 100ths: :22.77 :44.55 1:08.21 1:20.54

Thats pretty incredible.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2006, 11:56 AM
TitanSooner TitanSooner is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Alamitos
Posts: 1,303
Default

maybe the Turfway horses really are just SLOW?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2006, 11:58 AM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TitanSooner
maybe the Turfway horses really are just SLOW?
No its just a different type of "polytrack" than Woodbine. And Hollywood will have yet another unique kind.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:12 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well it is incredible with what they have done with the surface at Turfway. Not only is it faster and less kickback, but horses absolutely love it. It is simply amazing. I was at a Turfway board meeting the other night and the numbers are amazing. The projected number is unreal as well. The number of barn inquiries for the winter is out of this world. Finally they got it right.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:23 PM
Pointg5 Pointg5 is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eurobounce
Well it is incredible with what they have done with the surface at Turfway. Not only is it faster and less kickback, but horses absolutely love it. It is simply amazing. I was at a Turfway board meeting the other night and the numbers are amazing. The projected number is unreal as well. The number of barn inquiries for the winter is out of this world. Finally they got it right.
Yes, you can never have too many 10k claimers...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:27 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pointg5
Yes, you can never have too many 10k claimers...
No you can't. Especially for those people who love horse racing but do not have deep pockets.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2006, 01:30 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bababooyee
I was out at Turfway last weekend, and I could not believe the condition of the horses. Given their condition, you could tell they are treated very well. I don't recall such a high percentage of the horses looking so nice at TP in the spring. This fall is going to be fun out there!
Very good point. I noticed the same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2006, 01:07 PM
SundayStar's Avatar
SundayStar SundayStar is offline
Golden Gate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eurobounce
Well it is incredible with what they have done with the surface at Turfway. Not only is it faster and less kickback, but horses absolutely love it. It is simply amazing. I was at a Turfway board meeting the other night and the numbers are amazing. The projected number is unreal as well. The number of barn inquiries for the winter is out of this world. Finally they got it right.

it's certainly a lot better than last meet in regards to the kickback and the times. maybe this plastic stuff will work out after all. i know that they changed the mixture to decrease the kickback and it looks like faster times resulted as well but.......... is the track still "safe"? i have to wonder if they are going faster, is it still as cushiony? isn't it the "cushion" that makes it "safe"?

since everyone seems to be going to it, i hope it works out and the adjustment they've made at turfway is encouraging but i still have concerns about long-term effects.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-21-2006, 01:19 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SundayStar
it's certainly a lot better than last meet in regards to the kickback and the times. maybe this plastic stuff will work out after all. i know that they changed the mixture to decrease the kickback and it looks like faster times resulted as well but.......... is the track still "safe"? i have to wonder if they are going faster, is it still as cushiony? isn't it the "cushion" that makes it "safe"?

since everyone seems to be going to it, i hope it works out and the adjustment they've made at turfway is encouraging but i still have concerns about long-term effects.
The "tweaked" surface is just as safe if not safer the the original.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:25 PM
TitanSooner TitanSooner is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Alamitos
Posts: 1,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oracle80
No its just a different type of "polytrack" than Woodbine. And Hollywood will have yet another unique kind.
are both Woodbine and Turfway actual "Polytrack" ?? I know that Hollywood is a different manufacturer..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:29 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TitanSooner
are both Woodbine and Turfway actual "Polytrack" ?? I know that Hollywood is a different manufacturer..
Yes and No. Turfway "tweaked" their PolyTrack surface. Both are similar but the % of components are different.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:38 PM
Round Pen's Avatar
Round Pen Round Pen is offline
Aqueduct
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ocala Fl
Posts: 604
Default Hmmmmm

Just wondering if Woodbine could have tweaked the track a little bit, I just looked at the works from this morning and they were pretty quick the fastest 1/2 of the morning was 45.4 and the fastest work of the day for 5/8's was 59.2.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:43 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Round Pen
Just wondering if Woodbine could have tweaked the track a little bit, I just looked at the works from this morning and they were pretty quick the fastest 1/2 of the morning was 45.4 and the fastest work of the day for 5/8's was 59.2.
They prob will at some point. But no one knows what the results were going to be until they run on the surface.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:44 PM
kentuckyrosesinmay's Avatar
kentuckyrosesinmay kentuckyrosesinmay is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UNC-CH will always miss Eve Carson. RIP.
Posts: 1,874
Default

Wow, the horses must be really loving the stuff... I may have been wrong, and synthetic surfaces may really be the right way to go at some of the tracks in the U.S. I really like those results...

Let's see how Hollywood does...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-21-2006, 07:24 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Round Pen
Just wondering if Woodbine could have tweaked the track a little bit, I just looked at the works from this morning and they were pretty quick the fastest 1/2 of the morning was 45.4 and the fastest work of the day for 5/8's was 59.2.
Round Pen the whole tweaking thing has had my interest and I agree.
All teh wonderful marketing material about this stuff said it was maintenance free and required only harrowing once a day.
Funny that now all of a sudden Turfway had to redo it all and now Woodbines seems to be able to be "tweaked". Funny, the marketing guys said that this was not so, just a uniform surface that required no maintenance.
Remington Park tried some surface awhile back that was like Poly, and it produced wickedly fast times.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-21-2006, 08:24 PM
paisjpq's Avatar
paisjpq paisjpq is offline
top predator.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,020
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eurobounce
Yes and No. Turfway "tweaked" their PolyTrack surface. Both are similar but the % of components are different.
also when 'polytrack' brand is used they find local sand and other local components to make up the surface so the difference could lie there as well.
__________________
Seek respect, not attention.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.