Warm THIS!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

especially when 'new science' juggles and loses/destroys its evidence

No, Dell, all of "science" didn't juggle and lose or destroy evidence. A couple guys at one place averaged temps to show NZ temps increasing when they stayed the same.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

No, Dell, all of "science" didn't juggle and lose or destroy evidence. A couple guys at one place averaged temps to show NZ temps increasing when they stayed the same.

wrong as usual AGAIN!

Does Carter have a new book coming out?

Saw one titled simply 'For Dummies' and thought it was his.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

wrong as usual AGAIN!

Does Carter have a new book coming out?

Saw one titled simply 'For Dummies' and thought it was his.

Wow. Before you throw stones, you really need to get a clue. Maybe try and understand what we are talking about?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Wow. Before you throw stones, you really need to get a clue. Maybe try and understand what we are talking about?

You said and again I quote, "A couple guys at one place averaged temps to show NZ temps increasing when they stayed the same."

Now we know it was more than a couple guys and one place. Face it you were wrong as usual. And how in the hell do you know how much data was destroyed?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

You said and again I quote, "A couple guys at one place averaged temps to show NZ temps increasing when they stayed the same."

Now we know it was more than a couple guys and one place. Face it you were wrong as usual. And how in the hell do you know how much data was destroyed?

if you paid attention in science class, you'd know how much was destroyed too.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

if you paid attention in science class, you'd know how much was destroyed too.

Or if I were an Obama loving, conservative Republican, who thought Carter is an authority on the middle east and knew people w/medical insurance who pay out-of-pocket instead of filling out forms.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

You said and again I quote, "A couple guys at one place averaged temps to show NZ temps increasing when they stayed the same."

Now we know it was more than a couple guys and one place. Face it you were wrong as usual. And how in the hell do you know how much data was destroyed?

Please, I beg of you, read something besides the right-wing blogosphere.

No, the guys I spoke of are in the CRU. These guys.

[SOREHOOF]

Originally Posted by Riot

Please, I beg of you, read something besides the right-wing blogosphere.

No, the guys I spoke of are in the CRU. These guys.

Like the Huffington Post!

[Riot]

Originally Posted by SOREHOOF

Like the Huffington Post!

I did say, "It's fairly accurate". It has it's little left wing rants. Feel free to completely ignore those. But the facts stand up.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

Please, I beg of you, read something besides the right-wing blogosphere.

No, the guys I spoke of are in the CRU. These guys.

Those poor guys were subject to a crime.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...criminal-probe

oops and now NASA may be facing some scrutiny.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-climate-data/

Are you as delusional in real life as you are here? Huffington???

As stated before if global warming was as clear-cut as some may believe there would NEVER be a need to juggle data. The fact that not only was data manipulated and destroyed, the process was discussed and now the hackers are at fault in Boxer's eye as opposed to the scientists? These hackers should be praised as whistle-blowers and receive compensation for exposing this fraud. IMO Look at the money we will save by avoiding Cap and Trade taxes. And if you want a project to do in between Jimmy Carter novelettes look up who originated the carbon credit bartering system. Hint it wasn't Al Gore though like other inventions he has taken the credit.

[Riot]

[quote]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Those poor guys were subject to a crime.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...criminal-probe

oops and now NASA may be facing some scrutiny.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-climate-data/

Scrutiny is excellent. For the scientists.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Those poor guys were subject to a crime.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...criminal-probe

oops and now NASA may be facing some scrutiny.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-climate-data/

Are you as delusional in real life as you are here? Huffington???

As stated before if global warming was as clear-cut as some may believe there would NEVER be a need to juggle data. The fact that not only was data manipulated and destroyed, the process was discussed and now the hackers are at fault in Boxer's eye as opposed to the scientists? These hackers should be praised as whistle-blowers and receive compensation for exposing this fraud. IMO Look at the money we will save by avoiding Cap and Trade taxes. And if you want a project to do in between Jimmy Carter novelettes look up who originated the carbon credit bartering system. Hint it wasn't Al Gore though like other inventions he has taken the credit.

i recently have tried to stay away from the pol/soc "debates" where both sides are already locked into position. but i read the nasa article you posted after reading another one of yours suggesting riot was deluded for linking something from the huffington post.

do you realize there is NOTHING (and i never use caps) in that article other than speculation? there is no evidence. there isn't even really an allegation of any wrongdoing. it really comes down to super spin about the fact that a foi request has taken some time for a response.

the huffington post article was a gold standard of journalistic integrity compared to that steaming sled of partisan dung.