![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
you do get the overall point that lewiston has been, at least in the past (the 5 words after the comma are just for your benefit), a major hub for taking offshore money? because if you concede that, i think it's for you to prove that's no longer the case. you should try politics/society. you're a natural for that forum. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Who else would have played a ticket large enough to cover a $63, $44 and $52 horse but a whale with a rebate shop?
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
canadians? -bt- |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
A buddy of mine told me today that the thoroughbred daily news reported that the one winning pick 6 ticket for Saturday was purchased in South Dakota for $48. They singled conduit and goldikova.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some guys from somewhere in the Dakotas won it in 2003 with a rediculously low bet. Maybe lightning strikes in the same place again? This was also at Santa Anita back when it was a dirt track.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
So much for your big rebate shop bettor conspiracies:
http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/nat...ge-ticket.aspx Was 48 dollars large enough for you Philcski? |