|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
11-01-2009, 10:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
#2
11-01-2009, 10:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Her stablemate ran a faster TG at the same distance, and the Bris figures have her 5th at 7F or longer.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
|
|
#3
11-01-2009, 11:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Her stablemate ran her big sheet number on dirt I would assume.
Bris figures are as bad as it gets. If I E-mailed PG'85 a bunch of charts and tables he could make way better figures than Bris on his own.
|
|
#4
11-01-2009, 11:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Of course- it was in the Spinaway behind Hot Dixie Chick- and I've already shown my discontent with her.
I fully expected the dismissal of the Bris figures. Quite frankly, the Beyers are so terrible these days, especially on synthetics, I like using Brisnet better. At least I know when they're flawed. Beyer figures rank somewhere around Roman's Performance Figures for me. Useless.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
|
|
#5
11-01-2009, 11:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I make my own ... and I'd say about 90-95% of the time the Beyers are within 3 points of my own numbers.
The figure makers very rarely do anything stupid unless its on a tricky day. I set an all-time record for variant splits and races cut loose with my PID ones ... you'd probably hate my own numbers more than the Beyers if you actually bother to look at BRIS.
|
|
#6
11-02-2009, 06:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
Hybrid Mode
