Remember this?

[Riot]

The efficacy of a particular vaccination has nothing at all to do with the current healthcare reforms about to be passed.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by Riot

The efficacy of a particular vaccination has nothing at all to do with the current healthcare reforms about to be passed.

It has to do with the 'mindset' that you knuckleheads have permeated the air with,actually

[hi_im_god]

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/...per-correction

the retraction from the original source of this story.


http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/...d241678853.txt

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/...9642328892.txt

and the other articles from the posted source.

jesus. this rag actually makes fox look fair and balanced.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

It has to do with the 'mindset' that you knuckleheads have permeated the air with,actually

What "mindset" would that be? You'll have to explain that one. Because what you are talking about - the vaccines - came about during the Bush 2 administration.

You mean the Republicans and Bush are the "knuckleheads"?

But what the second Bush administration has to do with Merck trying to make money in the legal but questionable manner typical of big pharmaceutical companies is beyond me.

You have anything there to connect those two? Is that your point? The Bush administration being paid off by Merck regarding something with these vaccines? For .... what?

And then, what Merck trying to make money, and the Bush Two administration, has to do with any of the current healthcare reforms is ....

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

What "mindset" would that be? You'll have to explain that one. Because what you are talking about - the vaccines - came about during the Bush 2 administration.

You mean the Republicans and Bush are the "knuckleheads"?

But what the second Bush administration has to do with Merck trying to make money in the legal but questionable manner typical of big pharmaceutical companies is beyond me.

You have anything there to connect those two? Is that your point? The Bush administration being paid off by Merck regarding something with these vaccines? For .... what?

And then, what Merck trying to make money, and the Bush Two administration, has to do with any of the current healthcare reforms is ....

Spoken by the republican you have CONSISTENTLY pretended to be. How about a call for not taking (boycotting all Merck patented drugs whether they be now generic or not) and see how that works.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

Spoken by the republican you have CONSISTENTLY pretended to be. How about a call for not taking (boycotting all Merck patented drugs whether they be now generic or not) and see how that works.

You are making zero sense. If you are trying to speak as a good capitalistic Republican, against Merck, you are failing miserably

But your original post was to try and involve the current administration somehow in that? If you could explain how?

This is the way all pharmaceutical companies work. Making money. It drives their very valuable stocks. Who has what new drug in the pipeline, and when do the patents come off the old ones. They create a drug, then they try to create a market directly with the consumer. They no longer can ship doctors off to the Bahamas for "a week of continuing education on NSAID's"

Why, specifically, do you think Merck should be boycotted? Geesh, you sound like an absolute progressive with that anti-drug company suggestion!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

You are making zero sense. If you are trying to speak as a good capitalistic Republican, against Merck, you are failing miserably

But your original post was to try and involve the current administration somehow in that? If you could explain how?

This is the way all pharmaceutical companies work. Making money. It drives their very valuable stocks. Who has what new drug in the pipeline, and when do the patents come off the old ones. They create a drug, then they try to create a market directly with the consumer. They no longer can ship doctors off to the Bahamas for "a week of continuing education on NSAID's"

Why, specifically, do you think Merck should be boycotted? Geesh, you sound like an absolute progressive with that anti-drug company suggestion!

I think you and those who oppose this rediculous fraud imposed on the people by that evil emire known as Merck boycott.

I'm with the minority and think their profits were made after mucho R/D $$$$ was invested and they hit oil.....And America is supposed to run on as you said "Making money. It drives their very valuable stocks."

What are you talking about?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

I think you and those who oppose this rediculous fraud imposed on the people by that evil emire known as Merck boycott.

I'm with the minority and think their profits were made after mucho R/D $$$$ was invested and they hit oil.....And America is supposed to run on as you said "Making money. It drives their very valuable stocks."

???? Huh? I don't think Merck imposed any "ridiculous fraud" on anybody. Didn't you bother to read what I wrote?

Hey, Timmi - this vaccine was just approved for men and boys, too, this past weekend.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by Riot

What "mindset" would that be? You'll have to explain that one. Because what you are talking about - the vaccines - came about during the Bush 2 administration.

You mean the Republicans and Bush are the "knuckleheads"?

But what the second Bush administration has to do with Merck trying to make money in the legal but questionable manner typical of big pharmaceutical companies is beyond me.

You have anything there to connect those two? Is that your point? The Bush administration being paid off by Merck regarding something with these vaccines? For .... what?

And then, what Merck trying to make money, and the Bush Two administration, has to do with any of the current healthcare reforms is ....

boy, give you a nickel and.......