Obama Gets 2009 Nobel Peace Prize

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by cmfhb411

I agree 100%.
I was not surprised, but disappointed in how much fun Beck and his crew had with this on his radio show. I expected it on some level but would have guessed he'd back off once he acknowledged the pause in the President's speech.

If it were up to me, we as Americans would make it crystal clear our criticism
and focus is all on the Nobel Prize Committee and we don't hold this as a negative towards the President.

But unfortunately that didn't happen.
The vibe had too much of the "he brought this on to himself" feel for my taste.

You must be kid'n. If Betty Crocker gets raped by someone white as an egg, then they are gunna find a way to link it back to Obama. It's obvious they won't work with him on anything, and then, they are still gunna say he accomplished nothing (as they openly pray for the country to pleeeeease tank.) I just think it's kind of sick that people elected a guy to be bipartisan, and then are giving a free ride to those that are fighting that bipartisan effort. Look at all the "Hi, I'm God" type Independents that voted for someone to lead a bipartisan effort. Are those Independents complaining about the fact he is the only one trying to be bipartisan?... No, of course not. After voting(especially in Indiana..thank you so much,) they've fallen asleep again.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

You must be kid'n. If Betty Crocker gets raped by someone white as an egg, then they are gunna find a way to link it back to Obama. It's obvious they won't work with him on anything, and then, they are still gunna say he accomplished nothing (as they openly pray for the country to pleeeeease tank.) I just think it's kind of sick that people elected a guy to be bipartisan, and then are giving a free ride to those that are fighting that bipartisan effort. Look at all the "Hi, I'm God" type Independents that voted for someone to lead a bipartisan effort. Are those Independents complaining about the fact he is the only one trying to be bipartisan?... No, of course not. After voting(especially in Indiana..thank you so much,) they've fallen asleep again.

I don't know what you been smoking, but Obama,Pelosi,Reid,Hoyer have in no way been bipartisan. There could be a fringe element of those who want the country to tank because of Obama, but they don't represent any type of respectable conservative. And that fringe is dwarfed by the "Bush Derangement Syndrome" that runs amok in media,schools and colleges!

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

I don't know what you been smoking, but Obama,Pelosi,Reid,Hoyer have in no way been bipartisan. There could be a fringe element of those who want the country to tank because of Obama, but they don't represent any type of respectable conservative.

No, Pelosi, Reid, and Hoyer aren't bipartisan. Obama can control them if he can get a reason, too, but so far nobody from an "in play" state (DEM or REP) wants to look like they're letting him accomplish something. Bush was disliked by Conservatives for what he didn't do. He was disliked by most others for what he did get done.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

He's gunna have to threaten to campaign against these back-stabbing DEMS in the Democratic Primaries. He can get this scum beat. They better wake up, cuz he can punish them if he wakes up. Call them in. Inform them. That's it. Tell them: "If You defy me, you aren't even getting to face Republicans in the general election. Come correct, or become roadkill." See, Scuds has the answer, and the brotha is still examining the cube for a tame solution that isn't there. No Pressure...No Pleasure.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

No, Pelosi, Reid, and Hoyer aren't bipartisan. Obama can control them if he can get a reason, too, but so far nobody from an "in play" state (DEM or REP) wants to look like they're letting him accomplish something. Bush was disliked by Conservatives for what he didn't do. He was disliked by most others for what he did get done.

At this point in the debate,Bush is irellevent. Obama has given the knuckleheads free reign to construct legislation or to quash it. The has been no meaningful dialogue. Senate Republicans have a proposal...it's called 3400.
Bill 3200, which has been the 1000 lb monkey in the room, has morphed in to the Baucas bill, I think.

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

At this point in the debate,Bush is irellevent. Obama has given the knuckleheads free reign to construct legislation or to quash it. The has been no meaningful dialogue. Senate Republicans have a proposal...it's called 3400.
Bill 3200, which has been the 1000 lb monkey in the room, has morphed in to the Baucas bill, I think.

Needs to discipline his own people. He went wrong by tolerating their bullsht (at all.) Why be so nice with this here disgraceful lice.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

Needs to discipline his own people. He went wrong by tolerating their bullsht (at all.) Why be so nice with this here disgraceful lice.

He's not a hands-on kinda guy! Relative newcomer to BIG political stage(this ain't Chicago) Inept at dealing with the intricacies of global diplomacy, and has absolutely no clue on how to manage a war, or take of our troops....no doubt about it, he's on a roll!

Just read an article that said Obama is thinking of paying the Afghans not to fight for the Taliban.....he's LOST!

[Danzig]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...239280914.html