![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Think of all the SLOW horses on rubber that turn out to be FAST on dirt. This alone should be enough to justify all those days when it rains and the handicapper is subjected to sloppy tracks and off the turfers. Of course, anyone accustomed to playing poly just, in most cases, handicaps as if nothing has changed on days like this. That's handicapping free and easy. Lets consider the options: 1) we get FAST figures and we spend a lot of extra time handicapping races that aren't run on their intended surface AND, more importantly, we preserve that long held DIRT IS SUPERIOR tradition in horse racing. we also get a ton of freebies with all the track biases 2) we IGNORE figures and get to bet on what we handicap and enjoy FAIR racing I've opted for 2 as I'm not committed to a FIGURE PARADIGM and a proponent of doing as little work as possible and playing FAIR whenever possible |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I can promise you that making figures is more important there than at any track I've ever seen before ... and the racing is often anything but "fair" There have been no-brainer severe dead rails in 2008 that have lasted each racing day for several weeks. There have been no-brainer gold rails at this meet - that have lasted for as many as 9 or 10 racing days at a time. There have been EXTREME speed biases that have occured for several day stretches over each of the three meetings. I've got trip notes for every single day of Saratoga this meet. I don't have a single day - not one - where either a pro speed or anti speed bias occured. I only have a path bias for one day .. on Aug 22nd I have a very lukewarm "rail didn't seem like the best place to be all day" To bet a track like PID while ignoring figures and bias would be outright suicide. Those are by far and away the two dominant factors for that track imo. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As referenced by ME in another thread.....you again show your handicapping superiority to the rest of us....thank you Fat Man...thank you! ![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I didn't notice a bias of any type on the grass, on opening week there were two turf sprints on Thursday, both were won off the pace. On Sunday there was a claimer that was won off the pace. Week 2 may have been different. I thought the rail sucked while the track was re-drying out during the first half of Sunday and that contributed to Ea not being able to get by that slowpoke Pitched Perfectly. Of course, Heavenly Landing won up the inside in the 7th but by that point the sun had peeked out a bit and it was done drying for the most part. NT |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's what a quick check of the 1st part of the meet reveals. I hadn't looked at this data earlier and my initial comment related to 8/05, where, visually, it appears that there's a speed bias.
7/29 --- no TS 7/30 --- 2 TS --- no wire jobs 7/31 -- no turf 8/01 -- no TS 8/02 -- 1 TS -- no wire 8/03 -- no TS 8/05 --- 2 TS -- 2 wire jobs 8/06 -- 2 TS --- 1 wire job 8/07 -- 1 TS -- no wire job 8/08 -- 2 TS -- no wire job 8/09 -- 2 TS -- 2 wire jobs 8/10 -- 1 TS -- 1 wire job So, out of 13 turf sprints over 8 days, there were 6 wire jobs. 2 each (out of 2 races) on 8/05 and 8/09; and the other 2 on the subsequent day. While the number of wire jobs in relation to total turf sprints doesn't appear telling, I think the fact that they're clustered (3 out of 4; and 3 out of 3) does. Anyone willing to take this further is welcome to. Last edited by the_fat_man : 08-27-2009 at 11:28 AM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yeah, my cutbacks aren't getting there the same way that Rail Trip is a MILER and Straight Story is not only going to beat Battle of Hastings with a better trip but he's also, arguably the best 3 year old turfer in the country. ![]() |