![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Who is Racheal?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
You vs. spelling.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Synthetic race with decent field....Zenyatta wins
Match race....Rachel wins Dirt race with decent field......toss up |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Zenyatta's figs are lower, but I don't trust poly figs. They may still be a work in progress. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seems simple enough to me
Z's the undefeated, undisputed champ. RA is the young challenger which has yet to face older competition. If RA wants to be the champ, she needs to come out to the champ's house this fall and take on the undefeated champ in the BIGGEST event of the year. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Let's assume that Z wins the BC Classic, beating the BEST in THE WORLD. And RA is in her stall while this is happening (after having beaten up on the usual suspects in some race at BEL previously). Hard to make a case for R as horse of the year, IMO. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wouldn't RA be in a singular distinction if she can be equally as good on synth as she is on dirt? Isn't that worth an attempt in The BC? At times I think we make too much of this debate. A great horse, a truly great horse does not need excuses. I pointed out Secretariat's example of trying a new surface(turf) after the tc and beating older horses later that year on dirt. This is not ground breaking stuff we are talking about. Who knows maybe she can do it, Curlin tried it and ran his race, (in the same neighbourhood beyer boys) he just got beat, the surface did not beat him, a very good horse did. He ran exactly to his mediocre 2 races prior. This surface excuse is just a not too inconvenient truth if one asks me.
|