Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-15-2009, 09:10 PM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 44,044
Default True Quality barred from Jaipur over possible Paragallo tie

Jaipur entrant to be scratched by N.Y. board
By David Grening

http://www.drf.com/news/article/105539.html

The New York State Racing and Wagering Board will scratch True Quality out of Saturday's Grade 3, $150,000 Jaipur Stakes at Belmont Park because of "insufficient proof" that Paraneck Stable no longer has ownership interest in the colt, according to a board spokesman.

"After reviewing the available information on the proposed sale of True Quality," said Joe Mahoney, a board spokesman, "it was determined there was insufficient proof the Paragallos no longer have ownership in True Quality, so we're scratching the horse for Saturday."
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-15-2009, 09:14 PM
MisterB's Avatar
MisterB MisterB is offline
Woodbine
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Saratoga
Posts: 1,040
Default

Better safe than sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-15-2009, 10:23 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Anyone have more info or opinions on this one? This seems like a pretty big deal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2009, 05:59 AM
Echo Farm's Avatar
Echo Farm Echo Farm is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 464
Default

Tough call.

Shouldn't they have to prove that Top Quality is still owned by Paragallo and friends?

Has Paragallo been found guilty by a court of law?

Perhaps let True Quality run, put the earnings (if any) in escrow 'till this is sorted out.
__________________
"We are buried beneath the weight of information, which is being confused with knowledge; quantity is being confused with abundance and wealth with happiness. We are monkeys with money and guns. " ~ Tom Waits
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-17-2009, 07:07 AM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 44,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Echo Farm
Tough call.

Shouldn't they have to prove that Top Quality is still owned by Paragallo and friends?

Has Paragallo been found guilty by a court of law?

Perhaps let True Quality run, put the earnings (if any) in escrow 'till this is sorted out.
Racetrack management traditionally hasn't had burden of proof obligations. Private property.. Their rules. Holding True Quality out of this sends an excellent message. It says NYRA and the RWB are taking the sanctions against Paraneck/Paragallo 100% seriously, are following through on the penalties, and are being vigilant.

It also is a supportive stance for tough action against other 'undesirable conduct' around the racetrack... The threat of legal entanglement by penalized parties of any kind (trainers, jocks, owners) has been a thorn in the side of the states/tracks/industry in recent years, and being hard-assed about things has to start somewhere.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-17-2009, 07:18 AM
Echo Farm's Avatar
Echo Farm Echo Farm is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 464
Default

I agree somewhat, as I earn my living under the thumb of the American Kennel Club. They too have their own rules, and if you want to play the game, you comply.

The message is good, unfortunately it's not equal on a national basis.

Rachel Alexandra will run soon, True Quality won't get the opportunity.
(not that either horse really cares)
__________________
"We are buried beneath the weight of information, which is being confused with knowledge; quantity is being confused with abundance and wealth with happiness. We are monkeys with money and guns. " ~ Tom Waits
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2009, 08:57 AM
freddymo freddymo is offline
Belmont Park
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
Racetrack management traditionally hasn't had burden of proof obligations. Private property.. Their rules. Holding True Quality out of this sends an excellent message. It says NYRA and the RWB are taking the sanctions against Paraneck/Paragallo 100% seriously, are following through on the penalties, and are being vigilant.

It also is a supportive stance for tough action against other 'undesirable conduct' around the racetrack... The threat of legal entanglement by penalized parties of any kind (trainers, jocks, owners) has been a thorn in the side of the states/tracks/industry in recent years, and being hard-assed about things has to start somewhere.

Steve how hard is it to produce a bill of sale sign it and if necessary(which it hasn't) notarize ? If that isn't proof that ownership has been transfered then what the heck is? If there is a valid proof of sale, I sincerely hope NYRA has t's crossed and I's dotted because I suspect this will be settled in court.. Seriously, what the heck is so complicated about a bill of sale?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-18-2009, 09:08 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddymo
Steve how hard is it to produce a bill of sale sign it and if necessary(which it hasn't) notarize ? If that isn't proof that ownership has been transfered then what the heck is? If there is a valid proof of sale, I sincerely hope NYRA has t's crossed and I's dotted because I suspect this will be settled in court.. Seriously, what the heck is so complicated about a bill of sale?
While I have no knowledge of the circumstances involving this particular case NY started to refuse bills of sales that were obvious attempts to circumvent the rules. Things like selling a horse for $1 and such. A notary just proves who signed the document was the person who was listed, does not speak for the validity of the bill of sale. They perhaps asked to see the money trail, receipts, statements,etc. and there were none or were refused? And NYRA and the Racing board are two seperate entities. NYRA didnt scratch the horse.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.