shaq to the Cavs

#1 06-30-2009, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowgirlintexas

Coach...take it easy. Little harsh,don't you think?

No such thing. He's a great little guy.

How the f.uck do you know? Video chat?

cowgirlintexas · #2 07-01-2009, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

How the f.uck do you know? Video chat?

Wow.... You really must get a grip.

Be pretty hard to throw ball on video....or take to Karate.

cowgirlintexas · #3 07-01-2009, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants

How the f.uck do you know? Video chat?

Get your head out of the live cam private rooms,Coachy-poo.

It's the 21st century...

Gee, you people are easy to rile.

Cannon Shell · #4 07-01-2009, 08:02 PM

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....ap/index.html

Who the hell are they gonna hire to coach this team? Jerry Tarkanian, Paul Westhead or Doug Moe?

King Glorious · #5 07-01-2009, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....ap/index.html

Who the hell are they gonna hire to coach this team? Jerry Tarkanian, Paul Westhead or Doug Moe?

Doug Collins maybe. Maybe Bill Laimbeer. Maybe this is why Laimbeer just up and quit on the Detroit WNBA team like that.

dalakhani · #6 07-01-2009, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious

Doug Collins maybe. Maybe Bill Laimbeer. Maybe this is why Laimbeer just up and quit on the Detroit WNBA team like that.

Poor Curry never had a chance. As close to a sacrificial lamb as you can get in sports. Not to say that he was any good but really how do we know?

I like the moves. Laimbeer would be an interesting choice.

King Glorious · #7 07-01-2009, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani

Poor Curry never had a chance. As close to a sacrificial lamb as you can get in sports. Not to say that he was any good but really how do we know?

I like the moves. Laimbeer would be an interesting choice.

I think the move of sending Hamilton to the bench is what did him in. I think he could have been forgiven for the record. Everyone knew once they made the trade for Iverson that it was a move for the future and that they were hoping that they could stay competitive while re-tooling. The Hamilton deal though, I think that is what brought this to an end. This move though to bring in the new guys, this is what I have been expecting. They weren't going to do anything with Billups this year and this way, they get to move back into the top half of the conference without having to really bottom out. Without making that move, they wouldn't be in the position to get these guys and improve.

SniperSB23 · #8 07-01-2009, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious

I think the move of sending Hamilton to the bench is what did him in.

Yeah, you don't come in as a new coach with a veteran team and then go after the most respected veteran. Even Mike Singletary went after Vernon Davis who was a lazy ultratalented punk and all of his teammates knew it. If Singletary came in and went after Isaac Bruce, Walt Harris, or Takeo Spikes does anyone think that wouldn't have backfired on him? And he was Mike fricken Singletary.

Cannon Shell · #9 07-01-2009, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani

Poor Curry never had a chance. As close to a sacrificial lamb as you can get in sports. Not to say that he was any good but really how do we know?

I like the moves.

why?

dalakhani · #10 07-02-2009, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

why?

I like the moves because they are realistic. They Know they have a better chance of getting mickey mouse to suit up and play in motown than they do of getting wade, bosh or lebron.

Villanueva will turn 25 this year and he averaged 16 and 7 in 27 minutes a game. What do you mean with the derrick coleman thing? On top of that, you get him for slightly more than the anticipated midlevel exception.

Gordon can score with anyone in the league. I think this could signal a move to trade hamilton or stuckey.