![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Seems like a race to watch. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
111 Beyer for Rachel Alexandra.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
111 seems fine. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Zenyatta got a 104.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's new lifetime tops for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th place in behind her.
I guess Zenyatta just brings out the best in her competition. Obviously the extreme weight shift was going to bring them somewhat closer together in that race. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Unless it was pretty good, that would mean RA's last three races were all substantially faster than anything Zenyatta has run this year. These three races would include RA's race in the Preakness which, to me, was about as ideal a set-up as a horse like Zenyatta could hope for when facing RA. If, under those circumstances, RA can run faster than what Zenyatta is doing this year, that doesn't bode well for Zenyatta in any match up. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't have any real worries about Zenyatta on dirt, but I have no basis to believe that should would pull a IWR, either--that seems to be the exception, not the rule. Moreover, her general running style seems to be favored more often on poly than dirt.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
It could be a Winning Colors Personal Ensign type of thing..Or Rachel could just run away and hide? Not sure..Hoping for the best, first for them to meet and then, a photo finish with each one bringing out the very best in the other. Now lets see the owners and racing get it done..I think its pretty obvious who most people believe is faster. Think about an 11 for 11 muliple G1 winning mare not being favored to win.. Speaks a lot about Rachel
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
A 103 or higher is in line with her form ... but that means they have the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th place finishers all running lifetime career tops in the same race .. something that is almost impossible in a 6 horse field of older horses who have each run many times before. Obviously Beyers don't take weight into account - and they can be overly sensative with the way they do things with big horses like Zenyatta. By giving Zenyatta a respectable fig in line with her form .. you basically have to overrate the performances of all those horses who finished in behind her. The correct thing is to give Zenyatta the mediocre number that she ran - and leave handicappers to factor in the big weight shift she gave away for themselves as a reason why the performance was better than her medicore fig would suggest. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
I personally think that the payouts in the pick 3 & 4 that included Rachel Alexandra were very good. I know that there was a $40 horse in the sequance, but you would think that was the race you could have went deep in. I know I was 5 deep in that race on a $45 ticket and of course didn't have the winner. I'm thinking that some people even went deeper or even using the all button in that race (which was the toughest and most wide open one of the sequance) and were rewarded with some generous payouts.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |