What's the Record?

[Port Conway Lane]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

By the way, DWL may even be worse than 0 for 54. DRF is simply showing each trainer's record over a certain period of time. There is no cut-off based on when his last win was. I think they are just showing each trainer's record from either 2007-2009 or maybe 2006-2009. So DWL may even be 0 for 70 for all I know.

17 for 230 5 years 27% itm
7 for 168 4 years 22% itm
2 for 110 3 years 22% itm
0 for 74 2 years 22% itm
0 for 43 1 year 26% itm

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Port Conway Lane

17 for 230 5 years 27% itm
7 for 168 4 years 22% itm
2 for 110 3 years 22% itm
0 for 74 2 years 22% itm
0 for 43 1 year 26% itm

Wow. That is quite a cold streak as of late. He is at least 0 for 74 and he may even be 0 for 90 or so.

[cowgirlintexas]

Hopefully today he will break the streak...

I have him on top in a few supers.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by cowgirlintexas

Hopefully today he will break the streak...

I have him on top in a few supers.

If you like longshots and you like to bet trainers, I think you are better off betting a trainer who only occasionally takes a shot with a longshot in a big race. With those types of trainers, you know that it means something if they take a shot in a big race. They're only going to run the horse if they think the horse has some type of shot.

[cowgirlintexas]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

If you like longshots and you like to bet trainers, I think you are better off betting a trainer who only occasionally takes a shot with a longshot in a big race. With those types of trainers, you know that it means something if they take a shot in a big race. They're only going to run the horse if they think the horse has some type of shot.

This is true. I was just reaching a bit because Flying Private did'nt run the last two races badly and maybe would have been primed for his best today.
He really is a good looking horse, however this is'nt a beauty contest.