Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
MDO lost to Sarava...at 70-1 and the race went in 2:29.71 making it second only to commendable as slowest this decade. Yes...he fought...but it was still a crawl.
The final quarter mile of the Birdstone-smarty race was one of the slowest in belmont history...yes they were crawling its just smarty crawled slower.
Rags to riches was certainly not crawling. She ran a great last quarter although the rest of the race was slow.
I disagree with Lukas about the derby. 10f is pretty much the classic distance these days.
|
i just don't see how anyone can take any of his comments seriously when some of them are completely ridiculous. most people think that the reason so many top races are 10f because the derby is 10f-and therefore the 'classic' distance. so, what would happen if the derby was shortened? i think that would be a far bigger mistake to make than changing the belmont, and would have a bigger impact on the entire sport.
the issue isn't that the belmont is too long. the real issue imo is that too many other races have been shortened, and that weights aren't correct in these other races. too often you see the comment 'nothing left to prove'. older horses should have something to prove. but it seems that a horse can be asked to do no more at four than they are asked to do at june, as a three year old.