![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who's Race Impressed You The Most? | |||
| RACHEL ALEXANDRA'S 2009 Preakness Win |
|
29 | 32.22% |
| RAGS TO RICHES 2007 Belmont Win |
|
46 | 51.11% |
| Dead Heat |
|
15 | 16.67% |
| Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you're using the defeat of Curlin as the benchmark then you can't possibly differentiate between the two fillies. We're assuming that the competition Rachel beat on Saturday is inferior to a horse like Curlin. It very well might be, but the bottom line is that right now we don't know.
Granted, there's a difference between Mine That Bird at this point in his career and Curlin, but saying that Rags' win is superior because she beat that year's HOY takes a look at the entire year and not just the first six months. I think Rachel's win was decidedly more spectacular given the way she ran from start to finish. The "it was a phenomenal performance because of the stumble and wide trip" stuff never really made sense to me considering her running style. She was a horse who preferred being outside and off the pace. NT |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Coming off a negative 4 and then running with the speed the whole way and staying the distance, it is Rachel by quite a bit. She's really terrific.
|