![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Rupert Pupkin : 09-05-2006 at 07:38 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
disappointed, but not surprised.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Agreed, he was pushed hard to make a race he had no right to be in. Despite not having the proper foundation for that race, he ran an amazing second place. And it wasn't Nick's idea either. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
He was one of my favorites and had lots of potential, but once the entry slip was filled out in the Travers I was worried it would be his last race. Darn. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If they would have given him all the time he needed, he wouldn't have been ready to run until December. If you give a horse 3-4 months at the farm, they're not going to be ready to run for 6-7 months. They would have missed all the big races in the Fall and they didn't want to do that. They should have done that because he could have made all the big races this year. Instead he ran once and that was it. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I knew he was retired. Why does this come as "news" or a surprise. Did anybody actually think they were going to bring this poor horse back for more suffering...again? They're evil and greedy but not that bad!
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Poor horse. Could have been great as a 4 year old. But greed got in the way.
Maybe they learn from this. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Somebody started a thread about this a few weeks ago and I said he had been retired, at that time, over a month. They refused to publicly confirm the story. Perhaps they were working on a syndication deal.
Too bad...he was a very good horse. I don't understand how there is no backlash against Ed Sexton. This horse should have been given to a real trainer. |