Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-31-2009, 07:45 PM
Stall Mucker's Avatar
Stall Mucker Stall Mucker is offline
Cahokia Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 153
Default

Why was Will Rogers Downs selected for this buycott idea?

Why not a New York, Kentucky, Florida or California buycott? And how would this work with those facilities running racinos?

Got to be another way.

The buycott reminds me of the don't buy gasoline on a particular day idea. The oil companies don't give a fat rats......you'll need gas sooner or later.

Yes, bettors have a vote. Don't bet. But, why chase even more away from the game.

I believe the regulatory agencies have those operating race tracks (and OTBs) have those in the business handcuffed. It seems that a legislative route is the best way at this stage of the game with a collective agenda from operators, fans, bettors and all other stake holders.
__________________
....I don't ever wanna travel this God forsakin' trail no more. Mare take me home.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-31-2009, 07:51 PM
pweizer's Avatar
pweizer pweizer is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 1,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stall Mucker
Why was Will Rogers Downs selected for this buycott idea?

Why not a New York, Kentucky, Florida or California buycott? And how would this work with those facilities running racinos?

Got to be another way.

The buycott reminds me of the don't buy gasoline on a particular day idea. The oil companies don't give a fat rats......you'll need gas sooner or later.

Yes, bettors have a vote. Don't bet. But, why chase even more away from the game.

I believe the regulatory agencies have those operating race tracks (and OTBs) have those in the business handcuffed. It seems that a legislative route is the best way at this stage of the game with a collective agenda from operators, fans, bettors and all other stake holders.
My understanding is that a small gtrack was chosen so that the large extra influx of handle would be noticed.

Also, as the article makes clear, this is very different than a boycott. You are right that a boycott wouldn't work as players want to bet. This is not chasing money away from the game. It is adding money to a specific race. However, this could work if after a few of these track management sees that they could get large increases in handle by having player friendly policies.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-31-2009, 11:05 PM
DerbyCat's Avatar
DerbyCat DerbyCat is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA
Posts: 1,772
Default

So, what was the total handle for the race, does anyone know? How did it compare to other races that day? Did the "buycott" actually have a visible impact?
__________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.
- Friedrich Nietzsche on Handicapping
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2009, 11:22 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerbyCat
So, what was the total handle for the race, does anyone know? How did it compare to other races that day? Did the "buycott" actually have a visible impact?
No, and personally it is really a retarded idea. Betting a race at Bum**** Downs isn't going to get Churchill/Magna attention.

NOT BETTING will get their attention, but not one player, including myself, would do that
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-31-2009, 11:26 PM
DerbyCat's Avatar
DerbyCat DerbyCat is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA
Posts: 1,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
NOT BETTING will get their attention, but not one player, including myself, would do that

Exactly... which is why I bet on this race
__________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.
- Friedrich Nietzsche on Handicapping
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-31-2009, 11:26 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerbyCat
Exactly... which is why I bet on this race
I meant not betting their tracks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-31-2009, 11:29 PM
Scurlogue Champ's Avatar
Scurlogue Champ Scurlogue Champ is offline
Formerly 'moodwalker'
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville
Posts: 1,727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I meant not betting their tracks.
Well with things like Derby Barbie, the Over/Under, and Matrix wager, how could you avoid betting on Churchill? All of the elements are there.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-31-2009, 11:59 PM
DerbyCat's Avatar
DerbyCat DerbyCat is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Carlos, CA
Posts: 1,772
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I meant not betting their tracks.
Oh, I thought you meant not betting AT ALL... I'd hate to have to stop betting on any track at any time that I wanted to...




.....but I don't have a gambling problem
__________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.
- Friedrich Nietzsche on Handicapping
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-01-2009, 01:36 AM
jballscalls's Avatar
jballscalls jballscalls is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: renton, washington
Posts: 484
Default

looks like the handle from the 5th race was about 35K, in the 6th race it went up to about 55k and the 7th race it went down to 25k or so. these arent exact numbers, just me adding up the chart totals. but apparently there was a noticeable difference.
__________________
You can buy my horse racing/gambling novel Southbound at Amazon, BN, or Powells or various bookstores.

On twitter @BeemieAwards
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-01-2009, 05:59 PM
ceejay ceejay is offline
Detroit Race Course
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 289
Default

http://blog.horseplayersassociation.....html#comments
unofficial
Quote:
Mutuel Pool: +76%
Exacta Pool: +147%
Quinella Pool: +62%
Trifecta Pool: +92%
Superfecta Pool: +60%
Overall Pool Bump: Plus 96%

We had about a 77% jump in handle from race 6 last week. From race 4 today we had about a 450% pool jump. It appears HANA members and other bettors showed up a little early to bet race 5 as it had larger than average pool numbers. Further, Will Rogers overall handle for 11 races was just below $250,000. The HANA/Mayo race alone represented about 20% of the entire cards handle.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.