![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I've spent several tournaments in Vegas and one of the things I've noticed is the Sweet 16 lines are ALWAYS a lot tighter than you would expect. The dumb money has gone home after the 2nd round and the favorites end up being a bucket or two less than you would expect.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Why would North Carolina possibly be considering playing Lawson against Radford?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() chuck - you have blown my cover , i'm seth davis in disguise!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I dont know how important the seedings
really turn out to be unless you happen to get to play early, possibly shaky rounds at a familiar site (especially if you lost early in the conf. tourney). I would think that a coach would desire a good matchup as much as anything. For instance: I think Texas has a horribly difficult time against faster guard oriented teams that press. Bigger teams, that are patient and relatively non aggressive on D, is the type of team they want, the seed is not as important. Playing a Big 10 team for Texas is a good matchup(Minnesota possibly being almost a hand picked opponent). But if they win, Duke will kill them. UConn would be a much more desireable opponent even though still not a good matchup. But for teams that actually have a chance: You have to know some of the coaches are very cognisant of what type of team their personal and style match up best against. Meeting what might be a less talented (lower seeded team) team that plays a game that your team has a difficult time with... ya might not like the draw. Ya might wish to play a more talented team with a game your team thrives against. |