![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
go ahead and take a crack , i posted 4 lines , just interested in what you guys think the sweet 16 lines will be 1's vs 4's that's all |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Louisville -6 Wake Pittsburgh -4 Xavier Connecticut -8 Washington UNC -7 Gonzaga
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well we agree on 1 at least!
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think Wake is as likely to lose in the first round as they are to somehow make the Elite Eight. That team started out great, but definitely came back to earth a bit coming down the stretch.
Has anybody read the Giant Killers blog on ESPN at all? I wasn't high on them earlier, but after reading some stats, I'd be shocked if KU makes it past the first weekend. Opining on other early matchups: Oklahoma smells like a team that loses early. They rely a ton on FT differential, and with Griffin's recent travails, I'm not certain they're as good as the other #2 seeds. Missouri is sneaky good, and if anything is their downfall, it's tourney inexperience. Ditto West Virginia but with the tourney experience - they're just flat out pretty darn good. If I'm KU, I'm desperately hoping WVU somehow gets knocked off by Dayton lest I not make it to Indianapolis. The 7-10 games are all really crappy power conference teams playing other really crappy power conference teams. I wish at least a couple of those teams were something other than Cal or Michigan. Illinois is going down. Villanova turns the ball over way too often to have anything longer than a Sweet 16 run. Temple is making the Sweet 16. Anyway, I could prognosticate forever and probably be wrong about 3/4 of the stuff I just wrote. This is the best time of the year, guys.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs." |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Pitt- actually suprised by your choice this as i could never see vegas letting Pitt only give 4 to a Mid Major and 'vill give six to the runner up in the acc but at least you give an opinion on here thx |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've spent several tournaments in Vegas and one of the things I've noticed is the Sweet 16 lines are ALWAYS a lot tighter than you would expect. The dumb money has gone home after the 2nd round and the favorites end up being a bucket or two less than you would expect.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why would North Carolina possibly be considering playing Lawson against Radford?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
North Carolina (-2.5) Gonzaga (I guess -6) Louisville (-3.5) Wake Forest (I guess -4) Connecticut (-3.5) Washington (I guess -5) Pittsburgh (-6) Xavier (I guess -7) |