![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush sucked, yet we can already look back on those 8 years as "the good old days".
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Chuck, you have to remember - it's not about the people, it's about the power!
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
^^^Scuds style |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It holds that doing nothing is a bad idea because watching the economy tank all around you and watching people hurt and deciding that the only thing that will help is to make the rich richer (which seems to have been working really well leading us into this mess, eh?!) is....well, just a bad idea. You're making it sound far too complicated and far too political. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
2. I have a huge problem with the financial news networks "finding" reasons why the stockmarket has an up or a down day. No one ever seems to question the rather dubious claims made and very often taken as gospel. "The stock market plunged on news that..." bull you dont know this. The stock market has been extraordinarily shaky for a while now and is in a downward spiral and it seems that the most likely reason is uncertainty. People dont know if the "cure" will work or not, or even if there is a cure... I heard some people say the only cure is 2 years of pain. This is as good as any I have ever heard. The stock market looks backwards (monthly/weekly etc... reports that come in 1 month after the fact) and forwards. It seems to me it is much more complicated than "the stock market reacted to Iran's bellicose statements towards Israel" 3. The thing I hate most about the Democratic party. Its way too easy and dangerous- setting people against each other. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's that when the ONLY real option that Repubs are giving is "tax cuts" & "tax cuts" & "tax cuts" while offering NOTHING of substance to the debate that could actually help, then yes, I prefer taking other chances. There's what Obama's doing and there's just cutting taxes and crossing your fingers as our two apparent options. If nothing in the middle is offered, then I'll take an overreach rather than just cutting taxes. That certainly didn't help us steer clear of this mess in the first place. If there's a substantive debate to be had, then the Republicans are failing pretty miserably right now, because there's an awful lot of badgering Obama on the plan he came up with to fix it, and not a whole lot other than "just cut some more taxes" as an alternate solution. That's not helpful, and it's not effective as a singular strategy. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm reserving my opinion on how well Obama is doing on the economy considering the stimulus just passed last week. I think his closing of Guantanamo and denunciation of torture is a major step in the right direction, and the fact that the unnecessary $2 trillion war that your guy started will end is pretty cool, though I'm not happy with his planned "surge" in Afghanistan. I certainly don't think it's unreasonable or radical to not yet make extreme declarations about his Presidency one way or another. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's just 40 sumphin days durrrh
A year from now.. It's just 405 days durrh b..b..b..but Bush ahurr |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and, like i read earlier, things contracted more in the fourth quarter last year than they originally gave out, and obamas budget paints a rosier picture of growth than practically every economist out there. a rush to do something to turn things around is just that-a rush job. you get out what you put in. i think a bit more patience was called for. but the dems took the opportunity to pass a massive spending bill-two actually-based on fear. and they passed. and now we wait and see what happens. considering how pols usually do, i'd say this won't go any better than any thing else that's been tried on capital hill lately.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln Last edited by Danzig : 03-03-2009 at 10:19 PM. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
seriously though, my industry seems to be evaporating and blowing away at an alarming rate. the same thing is happening in South America and Europe. so far at least, the much heralded change in torture policy is having limited impact on our order activity. ![]() |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29249066 |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
there was democracy once in Iran, too, but when their elected officials wanted to nationalize the oil the british and ameicans could not let such a thing happen and the shah was installed.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Good lord, the GOP is bowing and scraping to Rush Limbaugh.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Obama also said he was trying to develop a process that "adheres to rule of law" but "doesn't result in releasing people who are intent on blowing us up." "I think it's going to take some time and our legal teams are working in consultation with our national security apparatus as we speak, to help design exactly what we need to do," Obama said. "But I don't want to be ambiguous about this. We are going to close Guantanamo and we are going to make sure that the procedures we set up are ones that abide by our Constitution," he said.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |