ahh..the good ole days..

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

she wasn't covert

she was involved with a shell company the cia set up to make connections with people that might want to sell or obtain components for wmd's. that's the way real intelligence works.

the entire operation was exposed with her.

how was it not covert?

why is she a traitor for being exposed but those that did it aren't?

[AeWingnut]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

she was involved with a shell company the cia set up to make connections with people that might want to sell or obtain components for wmd's. that's the way real intelligence works.

the entire operation was exposed with her.

how was it not covert?

why is she a traitor for being exposed but those that did it aren't?

she wasn't working for any of that
at least not sincerely

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

she wasn't working for any of that
at least not sincerely

i'm interested. can you stretch your point out?

what exactly are you saying?

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by AeWingnut

she wasn't working for any of that
at least not sincerely

This has to be Clinton's fault somehow...make it happen

[Cannon Shell]

You Steve Carltons refuse to debate the "stimlus" but are going to talk about issues of national security? When your party has considered bringing charges against CIA agents who were actually doing something productive but perhaps a little too messy for the utopian vision of the world that you all seem to have? I'd rather be "outed" by the Republicans than prosecuted by the Democrats for doing my job.

[hi_im_god]

chuck-

i'm having a wtf moment. steve carlton?

the pitcher?

i'll debate stimulus, the efficacy of torture as a method to extract actionable information, or anything else.

but that reference went over my head.

[Smooth Operator]

Lefty, eh

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

Lefty, eh

thanks. got it.

now i feel all dumb i had to ask.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator

Lefty, eh

usually the only USC affiliated person I would communicate with is OJ but I was impressed that you got it.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

chuck-

i'm having a wtf moment. steve carlton?

the pitcher?

i'll debate stimulus, the efficacy of torture as a method to extract actionable information, or anything else.

but that reference went over my head.

Despite the theories to the contrary, it has worked pretty well for thousands of years. My wife has perfected the art. And if SO broke the code before you did then i have nothing more to say to you.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Despite the theories to the contrary, it has worked pretty well for thousands of years. My wife has perfected the art. And if SO broke the code before you did then i have nothing more to say to you.

people will say anything you want them to under torture.

it's exposed countless heretics and witches. yea torture!

and it's apparently fairly satisfying to do to someone you're really pissed at. so i'd treat your wife a little better.

just hope she never joins the fbi. their agents walked out of abu gharib in disgust at the unsophisticated unproductive methods used.

and i have no excuse for missing the lefty reference. no torture required to get that out of me.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Despite the theories to the contrary, it has worked pretty well for thousands of years.

What exactly are you basing this statement on?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

You Steve Carltons refuse to debate the "stimlus" but are going to talk about issues of national security? When your party has considered bringing charges against CIA agents who were actually doing something productive but perhaps a little too messy for the utopian vision of the world that you all seem to have? I'd rather be "outed" by the Republicans than prosecuted by the Democrats for doing my job.

i would prefer neither of those things. secret agent men shouldn't have to worry about what party is in power, or which way the wind is blowing politically...

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i would prefer neither of those things. secret agent men shouldn't have to worry about what party is in power, or which way the wind is blowing politically...

Absolutely. However the irony of democrats hand wringing over the treatment of a CIA agent when many of them want to prosecute agents (for doing what their jobs required) is telling.