|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
08-30-2006, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Jeezusssss. Nothing illegal. You dont know half of DeLay's problems. Dont have anything to do with the CIA crud. Libby has his hands in everything including the baby food. And Richard Nixon never did anything illegal either. Roiiiggghtttt. God help you. Open your eyes. 
|
|
#2
08-30-2006, 08:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
... the more your hypocrisy becomes even more evident. I once thought you were simply wrongheaded ... but your reaction to this reveals you as a mindless kool-aid drinker ... who cares not a whit for truth, decency, honor or integrity. As of this moment ... I am through dealing with you ... you're ineducable, unspeakable, and insufferable.
|
|
#3
08-30-2006, 08:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It gets tiresome dealing with people who read what they want, and cannot understand true complexity involved with political situations. Inflexible, concrete set minds are very tough for me to deal with so ... Good Day or Night. And good luck to you.
|
|
#4
08-30-2006, 09:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 Props for spelling "hypocrisy" correctly. It gets mispelled a lot. So does "mispelled," for that matter.
|
|
#5
08-30-2006, 09:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
And props for BB (whoever he may REALLY be... hint, hint) for bringing up the Armitage/Plame thing, even if he only talked about half the story. This might help clear up the confusion: Tim Grieve from Salon writes:
<<Plamegate, or the truth about Dick A report that Richard Armitage leaked Valerie Plame's identity to Bob Woodward and Robert Novak answers one of the big outstanding questions in Plamegate. But does it suggest, as at least one right-wing blogger argues today, that the entire investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame has been much ado about nothing? Hardly. As we said this morning, what we seem to have here is two separate, albeit related, paths by which Plame's identity was exposed. Richard Armitage appears to have leaked to Woodward and Novak either as a slip-up or as a gambit in intra-administration, protect-your-flank politics. Scooter Libby and Karl Rove leaked, collectively speaking, to Novak and Judy Miller and Tim Russert and Matt Cooper as part of what Patrick Fitzgerald has called a "concerted effort" to "discredit, punish or seek revenge against" a critic of the president's war in Iraq. If two people run the same red light at about the same time, one because he's distracted by his cellphone, the other because he's driving the getaway car after a bank robbery, the coincidence of their actions doesn't make them part of the same crime syndicate, nor does the relative innocence of the one have much at all to do with the guilt of the other. Which is to say, the fact that Armitage leaked Plame's name -- carelessly or for his own political purposes -- doesn't tell us much at all about the existence of any conspiracy among Dick Cheney, Libby and Rove. So when will we know more about that? Fitzgerald isn't under any obligation to issue any final report on his investigation. So unless Libby actually goes to trial -- that is, if a pardon or a plea deal doesn't cut the proceeding short -- we may never learn much more from the office of the special counsel. The civil suit Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson have filed could lead to some compelled testimony by Cheney, Rove and Libby, but that's by no means a sure thing, and the judge assigned to the case is already showing some annoyance with the Wilsons and their legal team. That pretty much leaves journalists and historians, and we don't have high hopes for either right now. Unless something spectacular happens down the road -- and we're talking here of something on the scale of the indictment of the vice president -- we're betting that the mainstream press treats Plamegate as old news from here on out. (So far as we can tell, for example, neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post has said a word about the Michael Isikoff-David Corn Armitage story yet.) Iraq may be the dominant theme of this election cycle, but the way in which the Bush administration took the country to war there is only part of that story, and Plamegate is, in turn, only a substory within that part. We think it's a pretty important part, but reporters and editors could well decide that it isn't one that resonates all that strongly with readers. According to a Gallup poll out today, 40 percent of Americans either don't know who Karl Rove is or don't know enough to have an opinion about him. Yes, it's a chicken-and-egg problem, but is it any wonder that John Mark Karr will get a hell of a lot more airtime than Dick Armitage does this week? As for history? We're not holding our breath. If unreleased White House documents shed any further light on the vice president's role in Plamegate, the Bush administration has already done everything it can to prevent the public from ever getting its hands on them. It's hard to imagine Libby or Rove ever coming clean, at least so long as their futures as free men or their careers in Republican politics are an issue. Cheney? Forget about it. As U.S. News and World Reports is reporting, the vice president is apparently cooperating with an author on an authorized biography. The author? Stephen Hayes, the Weekly Standard writer who, as Think Progress notes, has made a cottage industry out of spreading the administration's false claims about Iraq. The most surprising thing Hayes has learned about his subject so far? That Cheney is a strong advocate for the "'softer side of the Bush doctrine, advocacy of democracy.'" >> Can I just say.... FORTY PERCENT OF AMERICANS DON'T KNOW WHO KARL ROVE IS?????? We are so doomed. The Chinese are so going to take over this country...
|
|
#6
08-30-2006, 10:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This story is all over ... Cheney, Rove, Libby, Gonzales ... all of them ... were completely honorable and completely vindicated ... ... and all the hate-Bushers ... including ... but not limited to ... Fitzgerald, Wilson, Plame, Powell, Armitage, Schumer, Matthews, and all the loony leftist bloggers .. including Mr. Grieve ... have been completely discredited. The only thing remaining ... will be the vengeance of a small percentage of the voters who pay attention to these things ... against the slimy leftist liars.
|
|
#7
08-30-2006, 10:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
... but the word is spelled "misspelled" ... ans misspelled "mispelled."
|
|
#8
08-31-2006, 06:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If only you were as smart on politics as you are about spelling... Oooh! Set up! Walked right into it! Ah, c'mere you! Big kisses, you crazy ol' Randite!
|
|
#9
08-31-2006, 07:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I assure you that this stuff isn't coming from me. I took Pgardn's approach to dealing with this person. Really not worth wasting my time. DTS
|
|
#10
08-31-2006, 09:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
So here we are ... a day later ...
... and not one leftist has the decency ... the integrity ... the guts ... to say, "Hey ... we were really wrong about this one ... there was no conspiracy by Cheney, Rove, or Libby ... Whispering Joe Wilson is a smarmy liar ... and we were duped by him ... but ... we'll develop better political arguments ... and win elections that way." As predicted and expected ... not a drop of shame or decency way out there in Leftyville.
|
|
#11
08-31-2006, 01:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
09-01-2006, 07:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Your charm is undeniable!! You must be cloned...end of story!!
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?!
|
|
#13
09-01-2006, 07:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
BB has just proved to us the undeniable proof that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove are the bastions of truth tellers in this world and are now due immediate transfer into sainthood. I was probably considered a leftist on the other board...so I humbly apologize to you BB as your eloquence and means of enlightening us to the truth sets us free. I bow down to you and your future clones when they come about!! How quickly you forget, that leftists control not one single branch of our federal government right now. So the real good guys are in power right now most definitely a stroke of good luck for us all. And how nice of those "leftist" journalists to tell the truth for once. You are finally getting through to even the leftists as I am getting "righter" all the time as this sincere in all means apology indicates. At what point can I be considered a "rightist"??
How's that????
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?!
|
|
#14
09-01-2006, 01:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, well, well ... lookie here ...
... one of the mainstays of the lying hypocritical leftists ... the Washington Post ... has come out with a snivelling, weasling non-apology for its role in this outrageous calumny against the truth ... ... and thrown the oleaginous girlie-boy ... Whispering Joe Wilson ... under the bus. Read it here ... all you shameless, gutless leftist creeps ... and weep ... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...101460_pf.html I gave you your chance to show some decency ... some honor ... some integrity ... but you chose instead to be true to yourselves ... ... worthless lying scum.
|
|
#15
09-01-2006, 01:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
... and reject hyperbolic, emotion-based, power-crazed, sand-throwing leftists and their lies. It takes inner strength and intellectual integrity to achieve that ... because it's ever-so-easier to join the shallow herd taking the oh-so-chic paths of negativism and nihilism. Are you up to it? Last edited by Bold Brooklynite : 09-01-2006 at 01:45 PM.
|
|
#16
09-01-2006, 01:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Speaking of sand, did you find the four handfuls that I threw into your sleeping bag before I peed in it?
btw Bold Fraud, you might just want to go back and reread (?) a key paragraph in the Post article you put up.
|
|
#17
09-02-2006, 10:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You think Anton Scalia pursues the truth? Do you really? The other guys you mention I withhold judgement. But I could give you a list of rightwinging liars and you would not have a leg to stand on. Rightwingers pursue the truth... Good lord please help him. Seriously, this guy BB is clearly bright. But so incredibly shortsided. I taught a kid like this. He was brilliant, but incredibly naive. He wrote a book at 17 on Justice Tom C. Clark and got it published. It was really quite good. He was a math genius (ran out of math too teach him, Calculus II as a Junior) with an incredibly good grip of the English language. He went abroad to study. His Japanese teacher said he had almost complete control of the language after 1 year of study and 2 months in Japan... in High School, at 16 years old. But... the kid did not seek the truth. He did not want me to teach him about Evolution, did not want to hear it, because he knew the logic would appeal to his reasoning and totally rock his world. After spending that time in Japan, this kid went back to his church and gave a sermon at his church, basically stating that the Japanese will undoubtely go to hell. Unbelievable. BB reminds me of a dumb version of this kid... and old enough to carry snake oil in his hip pocket. And he knows its snake oil.
|
|
#18
09-02-2006, 10:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Snake oil: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil Last sentence says it all.
|
Hybrid Mode
