![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
With the inability to run 1 1/16 mi races at GP, the Davis has become a more significant race. It probably should be considered for a G3.
I'd have to sit down with this years calendar to come up with others.
__________________
RIP Monroe. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does anyone think there's a chance in h*ll the Arkansas Derby will ever get a Grade I status?
__________________
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would hope they take the G3 status away from the Delta Jackpot.
That was a horrible race the past couple of years. If it's possible to have an anti-key race with a million dollar purse ,this is it. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I know this is probably a minority opinion, but the Arkansas Derby doesn't deserve Grade I status. Yes, it has had an impressive list of winners in the past few years, but the overall quality of its fields has been rather mediocre, and that's what the grade should reflect. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and i would think pretty much every race has a couple of good horses, followed by mediocrity, or less-for example, big browns fla derby this year. the grading supposedly reflects what happens to top finishers in a race in subsequent starts. lawyer ron, afleet alex, smarty, curlin--good reasons to give it gr 1. also, several preps leading to the ark derby have received graded status-but it seems a bit odd that the last prep before the ark is a gr 2 as well-the winner of that race is to get the same black type as the presumed tougher race? the only gr 1 at oaklawn now is the apple blossom.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a feeling that Arlington is going to get a couple more graded stakes in the future.
Their 1000 American Guineas race will end up being graded after it has run a couple more times and there is one other, can't think of it. I have a feeling that the Secretariat Stakes might lose its Grade 1 label as the fields the last 3-4 years have been subpar, at best..... |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
The AK Derby last year with Gayego and King Silver's Son or whomever...that was an awful field compared to previous years....could have more to do with the crop of 3-yo's last year than anything else.
My issue with Graded races is for 2-year olds. I just don't understand why there are so many Grade 1s and Grade 2s in the spring/early summer when it's basically a group of maiden winners entered. It's basically a first level allowance races masquerading as a G1 or G2 stakes race. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Arkansas Derby was a G1 from 1981-1988.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
This article from the Bloodhorse summarizes the Committee's work for 2009: http://news.bloodhorse.com/article/48193.htm
First reaction is that, with the state of US racing today, it defies logic that there will be six new grade I races next year, with only one justifiable downgrade (the Suburban). The BC Filly and Mare Sprint is worthy of Grade I status, but the five others are really a stretch, especially Belmont's Jamaica Handicap (a grass race restricted to 3YOs that does not draw fields anywhere close in quality to the Garden City, the fall meet's companion race for 3YO fillies). |